Comparison of the Effect of Plasma‐Activated Water and Artificially Prepared Plasma‐Activated Water on Wheat Grain Properties

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60461373%3A22340%2F22%3A43924631" target="_blank" >RIV/60461373:22340/22:43924631 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216208:11110/22:10445105

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/11/11/1471" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/11/11/1471</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11111471" target="_blank" >10.3390/plants11111471</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparison of the Effect of Plasma‐Activated Water and Artificially Prepared Plasma‐Activated Water on Wheat Grain Properties

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Recently, much attention has been paid to the use of low‐temperature plasmas and plasma‐activated water (PAW) in various areas of biological research. In addition to its use in medicine, especially for low‐temperature disinfection and sterilization, a number of works using plasma in various fields of agriculture have already appeared. While direct plasma action involves the effects of many highly reactive species with short lifetimes, the use of PAW involves the action of only long‐lived particles. A number of articles have shown that the main stable components of PAW are H2O2, O3, HNO2, and HNO3. If so, then it would be faster and much more practical to artificially prepare PAW by directly mixing these chemicals in a given ratio. In this article, we review the literature describing the composition and properties of PAW prepared by various methods. We also draw attention to an otherwise rather neglected fact, that there are no significant differences between the action of PAW and artificially prepared PAW. The effect of PAW on the properties of wheat grains (Triticum aestivum L.) was determined. PAW exposure increased germination, shoot length, and fresh and dry shoot weight. The root length and R/S length, i.e., the ratio between the underground (R) and aboveground (S) length of the wheat seedlings, slightly decreased, while the other parameters changed only irregularly or not at all. Grains artificially inoculated with Escherichia coli were significantly decontaminated after only one hour of exposure to PAW, while Saccharomyces cerevisiae decontamination required soaking for 24 h. The differences between the PAW prepared by plasma treatment and the PAW prepared by artificially mixing the active ingredients, i.e., nitric acid and hydrogen peroxide, proved to be inconsistent and statistically insignificant. Therefore, it may be sufficient for further research to focus only on the effects of artificial PAW. © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparison of the Effect of Plasma‐Activated Water and Artificially Prepared Plasma‐Activated Water on Wheat Grain Properties

Popis výsledku anglicky

Recently, much attention has been paid to the use of low‐temperature plasmas and plasma‐activated water (PAW) in various areas of biological research. In addition to its use in medicine, especially for low‐temperature disinfection and sterilization, a number of works using plasma in various fields of agriculture have already appeared. While direct plasma action involves the effects of many highly reactive species with short lifetimes, the use of PAW involves the action of only long‐lived particles. A number of articles have shown that the main stable components of PAW are H2O2, O3, HNO2, and HNO3. If so, then it would be faster and much more practical to artificially prepare PAW by directly mixing these chemicals in a given ratio. In this article, we review the literature describing the composition and properties of PAW prepared by various methods. We also draw attention to an otherwise rather neglected fact, that there are no significant differences between the action of PAW and artificially prepared PAW. The effect of PAW on the properties of wheat grains (Triticum aestivum L.) was determined. PAW exposure increased germination, shoot length, and fresh and dry shoot weight. The root length and R/S length, i.e., the ratio between the underground (R) and aboveground (S) length of the wheat seedlings, slightly decreased, while the other parameters changed only irregularly or not at all. Grains artificially inoculated with Escherichia coli were significantly decontaminated after only one hour of exposure to PAW, while Saccharomyces cerevisiae decontamination required soaking for 24 h. The differences between the PAW prepared by plasma treatment and the PAW prepared by artificially mixing the active ingredients, i.e., nitric acid and hydrogen peroxide, proved to be inconsistent and statistically insignificant. Therefore, it may be sufficient for further research to focus only on the effects of artificial PAW. © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10611 - Plant sciences, botany

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Plants

ISSN

2223-7747

e-ISSN

2223-7747

Svazek periodika

11

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

11

Stát vydavatele periodika

CH - Švýcarská konfederace

Počet stran výsledku

12

Strana od-do

nestrankovano

Kód UT WoS článku

000809153900001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85130983294