Does the Sign of Charge Affect the Surface Affinity of Simple Ions?
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60461373%3A22340%2F23%3A43926649" target="_blank" >RIV/60461373:22340/23:43926649 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c02641" target="_blank" >https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c02641</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c02641" target="_blank" >10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c02641</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Does the Sign of Charge Affect the Surface Affinity of Simple Ions?
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The role the charge sign of simple ions plays in determining their surface affinity in aqueous solutions is investigated by computer simulation methods. For this purpose, the free surface of aqueous solutions of fictitious salts is simulated at finite concentration both with nonpolarizable point-charge and polarizable Gaussian-charge potential models. The salts consist of monovalent cations and anions that are, apart from the sign of their charge, identical to each other. In particular, we consider the small Na+ and the large I– ions together with their charge-inverted counterparts. In an attempt to avoid the interference even between the behavior of cations and anions, we also simulate systems containing only one of the above ions, and determine the free energy profile of these ions across the liquid–vapor interface of water at infinite dilution by potential of mean force (PMF) calculations. The obtained results reveal that, in the case of small ions, the anion is hydrated considerably stronger than the cation due to the close approach of water H atoms, bearing a positive fractional charge. As a consequence, the surface affinity of a small anion is even smaller than that of its cationic counterpart. However, considering that small ions are effectively repelled from the water surface, the importance of this difference is negligible. Further, a change in the hydration energy trends of the two oppositely charged ions is observed with their increasing size. This change is largely attributed to the fact that, with increasing ion size, the factor of 2 in the magnitude of the fractional charge of the closely approaching water atoms (i.e., O around cations and H around anions) outweighs the closer approach of the H than the O atom in the hydration energy. Thus, for large ions, being already surface active themselves, the surface affinity of the anion is larger than that of its positively charged counterpart. Further, such a difference is seen even in the case when the sign of the surface potential favors the adsorption of cations.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Does the Sign of Charge Affect the Surface Affinity of Simple Ions?
Popis výsledku anglicky
The role the charge sign of simple ions plays in determining their surface affinity in aqueous solutions is investigated by computer simulation methods. For this purpose, the free surface of aqueous solutions of fictitious salts is simulated at finite concentration both with nonpolarizable point-charge and polarizable Gaussian-charge potential models. The salts consist of monovalent cations and anions that are, apart from the sign of their charge, identical to each other. In particular, we consider the small Na+ and the large I– ions together with their charge-inverted counterparts. In an attempt to avoid the interference even between the behavior of cations and anions, we also simulate systems containing only one of the above ions, and determine the free energy profile of these ions across the liquid–vapor interface of water at infinite dilution by potential of mean force (PMF) calculations. The obtained results reveal that, in the case of small ions, the anion is hydrated considerably stronger than the cation due to the close approach of water H atoms, bearing a positive fractional charge. As a consequence, the surface affinity of a small anion is even smaller than that of its cationic counterpart. However, considering that small ions are effectively repelled from the water surface, the importance of this difference is negligible. Further, a change in the hydration energy trends of the two oppositely charged ions is observed with their increasing size. This change is largely attributed to the fact that, with increasing ion size, the factor of 2 in the magnitude of the fractional charge of the closely approaching water atoms (i.e., O around cations and H around anions) outweighs the closer approach of the H than the O atom in the hydration energy. Thus, for large ions, being already surface active themselves, the surface affinity of the anion is larger than that of its positively charged counterpart. Further, such a difference is seen even in the case when the sign of the surface potential favors the adsorption of cations.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10403 - Physical chemistry
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GX21-26601X" target="_blank" >GX21-26601X: Zkoumání a transformace hmoty elektrony v kapalných mikrotryskách</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2023
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Journal of Physical Chemistry B
ISSN
1520-6106
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
127
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
27
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
12
Strana od-do
6205-6216
Kód UT WoS článku
001018807200001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85164625981