Testing Semiempirical Quantum Mechanical Methods on a Data Set of Interaction Energies Mapping Repulsive Contacts in Organic Molecules
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61388963%3A_____%2F18%3A00489840" target="_blank" >RIV/61388963:_____/18:00489840 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.8b00260" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.8b00260</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.8b00260" target="_blank" >10.1021/acs.jpca.8b00260</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Testing Semiempirical Quantum Mechanical Methods on a Data Set of Interaction Energies Mapping Repulsive Contacts in Organic Molecules
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Semiempirical quantum mechanical (QM) methods with corrections for noncovalent interactions provide a favorable combination of accuracy and computational efficiency that makes them a useful tool for a study of large molecular systems. It was, however, noted that the accuracy of these methods deteriorates at intermolecular distances shorter than equilibrium. In this work, we explore this issue systematically using a newly developed data set of benchmark interaction energies named R160x6. This data set maps repulsive contacts in organic molecules, and it consists of 160 model complexes for which six points along the dissociation curve are provided. Testing a wide range of semiempirical QM methods against the CCSD(T)/CBS benchmark revealed that most methods, and all the dispersion-corrected ones, underestimate the repulsion systematically. The worst cases are usually hydrogen hydrogen contacts. The best results were obtained with PM6-D3H4 and DFTB3-D3H4, as these methods already contain a correction for the H-H repulsion, but the errors are still about twice as large as in equilibrium geometries.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Testing Semiempirical Quantum Mechanical Methods on a Data Set of Interaction Energies Mapping Repulsive Contacts in Organic Molecules
Popis výsledku anglicky
Semiempirical quantum mechanical (QM) methods with corrections for noncovalent interactions provide a favorable combination of accuracy and computational efficiency that makes them a useful tool for a study of large molecular systems. It was, however, noted that the accuracy of these methods deteriorates at intermolecular distances shorter than equilibrium. In this work, we explore this issue systematically using a newly developed data set of benchmark interaction energies named R160x6. This data set maps repulsive contacts in organic molecules, and it consists of 160 model complexes for which six points along the dissociation curve are provided. Testing a wide range of semiempirical QM methods against the CCSD(T)/CBS benchmark revealed that most methods, and all the dispersion-corrected ones, underestimate the repulsion systematically. The worst cases are usually hydrogen hydrogen contacts. The best results were obtained with PM6-D3H4 and DFTB3-D3H4, as these methods already contain a correction for the H-H repulsion, but the errors are still about twice as large as in equilibrium geometries.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10403 - Physical chemistry
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GJ16-11321Y" target="_blank" >GJ16-11321Y: Rychlý kvantově-mechanický model pro popis nekovalentních interakcí ce velkých molekulárních systémech</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2018
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Journal of Physical Chemistry A
ISSN
1089-5639
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
122
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
10
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
8
Strana od-do
2801-2808
Kód UT WoS článku
000427910100021
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85044162904