A comparison of portal vein embolization with poly(2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate) and a histoacryl/lipiodol mixture in patients scheduled for extended right hepatectomy

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61389013%3A_____%2F15%3A00455921" target="_blank" >RIV/61389013:_____/15:00455921 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00023001:_____/15:00059698

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://www.biomed.cas.cz/physiolres/2015/6_15.htm" target="_blank" >http://www.biomed.cas.cz/physiolres/2015/6_15.htm</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

A comparison of portal vein embolization with poly(2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate) and a histoacryl/lipiodol mixture in patients scheduled for extended right hepatectomy

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

To determine whether PHEMA [poly(2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate)] is suitable for portal vein embolization in patients scheduled to right hepatectomy and whether it is as effective as the currently used agent (a histoacryl/lipiodol mixture). Two groups of nine patients each scheduled for extended right hepatectomy for primary or secondary hepatic tumor, had right portal vein embolization in an effort to induce future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy. One group had embolization with PHEMA, the other one withthe histoacryl/lipiodol mixture. In all patients, embolization was performed using the right retrograde transhepatic access. Embolization was technically successful in all 18 patients, with no complication related to the embolization agent. Eight patients of either group developed FLR hypertrophy allowing extended right hepatectomy. Likewise, one patient in each group had recanalization of a portal vein branch. Histology showed that both embolization agents reach the periphery of portal

Název v anglickém jazyce

A comparison of portal vein embolization with poly(2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate) and a histoacryl/lipiodol mixture in patients scheduled for extended right hepatectomy

Popis výsledku anglicky

To determine whether PHEMA [poly(2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate)] is suitable for portal vein embolization in patients scheduled to right hepatectomy and whether it is as effective as the currently used agent (a histoacryl/lipiodol mixture). Two groups of nine patients each scheduled for extended right hepatectomy for primary or secondary hepatic tumor, had right portal vein embolization in an effort to induce future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy. One group had embolization with PHEMA, the other one withthe histoacryl/lipiodol mixture. In all patients, embolization was performed using the right retrograde transhepatic access. Embolization was technically successful in all 18 patients, with no complication related to the embolization agent. Eight patients of either group developed FLR hypertrophy allowing extended right hepatectomy. Likewise, one patient in each group had recanalization of a portal vein branch. Histology showed that both embolization agents reach the periphery of portal

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FH - Neurologie, neurochirurgie, neurovědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2015

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Physiological Research

ISSN

0862-8408

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

64

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

6

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

8

Strana od-do

841-848

Kód UT WoS článku

000367547900006

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-84953272816