Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Electrochemical and microbiological insights into the use of 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane-functionalized anion exchange membrane in microbial fuel cell: a benchmarking study with Nafion

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61389013%3A_____%2F20%3A00518951" target="_blank" >RIV/61389013:_____/20:00518951 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1383586619351585?via%3Dihub" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1383586619351585?via%3Dihub</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2019.116478" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.seppur.2019.116478</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Electrochemical and microbiological insights into the use of 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane-functionalized anion exchange membrane in microbial fuel cell: a benchmarking study with Nafion

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    In this work, two polymeric membrane separators (a proton exchange membrane (PEM), Nafion, and an anion-exchange membrane (AEM), 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (DABCO)-functionalized PSEBS) deployed in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) are comparatively assessed. The performances of MFCs according to membrane type were evaluated by biological and electrochemical techniques, employing metagenomics, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and cyclic voltammetry (CV). It was found that the anodic biofilms of MFCs, irrespective of the type of membrane, were dominated by Geobacter sulfurreducens (37 and 50% for AEM-MFC and PEM-MFC, respectively), a well-known electrochemically active species. Furthermore, the AEM-MFC reflected a significantly lower internal resistance (145 Ω) compared to PEM-MFC (339 Ω) and produced higher maximal current densities and energy yields at all substrate (acetate) concentrations, as follows: 400 vs. 285 mA m−2 (5 mM acetate), 360 vs. 320 mA m−2 (10 mM acetate), 305 vs. 235 mA m−2 (15 mM acetate) and 238 vs.132 kJ m−2 gCOD (5 mM acetate), 161 vs. 128 kJ m−2 gCOD (10 mM acetate), 114 vs. 59 kJ m−2 gCOD (15 mM acetate) respectively. The CV measurements implied diffusion limitations in the MFCs, which were supported by EIS. In addition, the PEM and AEM characterizations revealed that in both cases, the ion exchange capacity, ionic conductivity and oxygen mass transport features were altered considerably over the 39 days during which the MFCs operated.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Electrochemical and microbiological insights into the use of 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane-functionalized anion exchange membrane in microbial fuel cell: a benchmarking study with Nafion

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    In this work, two polymeric membrane separators (a proton exchange membrane (PEM), Nafion, and an anion-exchange membrane (AEM), 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (DABCO)-functionalized PSEBS) deployed in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) are comparatively assessed. The performances of MFCs according to membrane type were evaluated by biological and electrochemical techniques, employing metagenomics, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and cyclic voltammetry (CV). It was found that the anodic biofilms of MFCs, irrespective of the type of membrane, were dominated by Geobacter sulfurreducens (37 and 50% for AEM-MFC and PEM-MFC, respectively), a well-known electrochemically active species. Furthermore, the AEM-MFC reflected a significantly lower internal resistance (145 Ω) compared to PEM-MFC (339 Ω) and produced higher maximal current densities and energy yields at all substrate (acetate) concentrations, as follows: 400 vs. 285 mA m−2 (5 mM acetate), 360 vs. 320 mA m−2 (10 mM acetate), 305 vs. 235 mA m−2 (15 mM acetate) and 238 vs.132 kJ m−2 gCOD (5 mM acetate), 161 vs. 128 kJ m−2 gCOD (10 mM acetate), 114 vs. 59 kJ m−2 gCOD (15 mM acetate) respectively. The CV measurements implied diffusion limitations in the MFCs, which were supported by EIS. In addition, the PEM and AEM characterizations revealed that in both cases, the ion exchange capacity, ionic conductivity and oxygen mass transport features were altered considerably over the 39 days during which the MFCs operated.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    10404 - Polymer science

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2020

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Separation and Purification Technology

  • ISSN

    1383-5866

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    237

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    15 April

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    NL - Nizozemsko

  • Počet stran výsledku

    9

  • Strana od-do

    1-9

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000509625700018

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85077011122