Physics of the creation and mitigation of runaway electron beams in presence of their background plasma.
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61389021%3A_____%2F17%3A00482605" target="_blank" >RIV/61389021:_____/17:00482605 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Physics of the creation and mitigation of runaway electron beams in presence of their background plasma.
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Disruptions are a threat for the reliable operation of future tokamaks including ITER. Among other consequences, they can convert a significant fraction of the plasma current into Runaway Electrons (REs) in the MeV range. The possibility to suppress a runaway beam once it has been accelerated remains uncertain. Previous experiments at JET have shown that the suppressionnof a 750 kA runaway beam using massive gas injection was inefficient [1]. This situation contrasts with results of smaller tokamaks such as DIII-D[2], Asdex-Upgrade[3], TCV[4] and Tore Supra[5]. A number of explanations have been brought forward to explain the inefficiency: a gas plume geometry effect, a runaway current screening effect or the shielding by the cold backgroundnplasma coexisting with the runaway beam. This background plasma has already been observed on several machines[2, 5], but gaps remain in the understanding of its physics. The present paper reviews the three latter possible explanations and the interaction between REs, the background plasma and the mitigation gas.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Physics of the creation and mitigation of runaway electron beams in presence of their background plasma.
Popis výsledku anglicky
Disruptions are a threat for the reliable operation of future tokamaks including ITER. Among other consequences, they can convert a significant fraction of the plasma current into Runaway Electrons (REs) in the MeV range. The possibility to suppress a runaway beam once it has been accelerated remains uncertain. Previous experiments at JET have shown that the suppressionnof a 750 kA runaway beam using massive gas injection was inefficient [1]. This situation contrasts with results of smaller tokamaks such as DIII-D[2], Asdex-Upgrade[3], TCV[4] and Tore Supra[5]. A number of explanations have been brought forward to explain the inefficiency: a gas plume geometry effect, a runaway current screening effect or the shielding by the cold backgroundnplasma coexisting with the runaway beam. This background plasma has already been observed on several machines[2, 5], but gaps remain in the understanding of its physics. The present paper reviews the three latter possible explanations and the interaction between REs, the background plasma and the mitigation gas.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10305 - Fluids and plasma physics (including surface physics)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2017
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
EPS 2017: 44th European Physical Society Conference on Plasma Physics
ISBN
979-10-96389-07
ISSN
—
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
4
Strana od-do
—
Název nakladatele
European Physical Society
Místo vydání
Mulhouse
Místo konání akce
Belfast
Datum konání akce
26. 6. 2017
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
EUR - Evropská akce
Kód UT WoS článku
—