Nuclear Genome Size: Are We Getting Closer?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61389030%3A_____%2F10%3A00349827" target="_blank" >RIV/61389030:_____/10:00349827 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Nuclear Genome Size: Are We Getting Closer?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Correct information on genome size is important in many areas of research For a long time, scientists have been struggling to understand the reason for the huge variation in eukaryotic genome size and its biological significance More recently, the knowledge on genome size has become important to structure genome sequencing projects as their scale and cost depend on genome size. Despite the fact that the first estimates of genome size in eukaryotes were made more than 50 years ago, we are still not quitesure about the exact genome size in practically all animal and plant species Moreover, different estimates continue to be published for the same species These discrepancies compromise data comparison and interpretation and point to methodological problems, which include standardization. This article assesses the current state of DNA reference standards for flow cytometry and the issues related to their calibration.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Nuclear Genome Size: Are We Getting Closer?

Popis výsledku anglicky

Correct information on genome size is important in many areas of research For a long time, scientists have been struggling to understand the reason for the huge variation in eukaryotic genome size and its biological significance More recently, the knowledge on genome size has become important to structure genome sequencing projects as their scale and cost depend on genome size. Despite the fact that the first estimates of genome size in eukaryotes were made more than 50 years ago, we are still not quitesure about the exact genome size in practically all animal and plant species Moreover, different estimates continue to be published for the same species These discrepancies compromise data comparison and interpretation and point to methodological problems, which include standardization. This article assesses the current state of DNA reference standards for flow cytometry and the issues related to their calibration.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

EB - Genetika a molekulární biologie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/LC06004" target="_blank" >LC06004: Integrovaný výzkum rostlinného genomu</a><br>

Návaznosti

Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)

Rok uplatnění

2010

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Cytometry. Part A

ISSN

1552-4922

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

77A

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

7

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

8

Strana od-do

—

Kód UT WoS článku

000279581600006

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—