Patients´and nurses´perceptions of individualised care: an international comparative study

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17110%2F12%3AA1201231" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17110/12:A1201231 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Patients´and nurses´perceptions of individualised care: an international comparative study

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The aim was to compare patients? and nurses? perceptions of individualised care in 5 EU countries. A cross-sectional comparative design was used. Data were collected from nurses (n = 960) and patients (n = 1315) in 71 surgical units from 26 acute hospitals (2009). Data were collected using two ICS and analysed descriptive and inferential statistics. Differences in patients? and nurses? assessments of individualised care were found between each country. Nurses assessed that they supported patient individuality more often. The Meann ranged from 3.61 (Greece)-4.31 (Hungary) and the Meanp ranged from 3.05 (Greece)-3.79 (Cyprus). To a large extent the care provided was individualised as defined by the Meann 3.75 (Greece)-4.36 (Hungary) and the Meanp 3.41 (Greece)-4.18 (Cyprus). In Cyprus and Finland, patients? assessed the individuality in their care corresponded well with nurses? assessments. Clear between-country differences in patients? and nurses? assessments were found in both subscale

Název v anglickém jazyce

Patients´and nurses´perceptions of individualised care: an international comparative study

Popis výsledku anglicky

The aim was to compare patients? and nurses? perceptions of individualised care in 5 EU countries. A cross-sectional comparative design was used. Data were collected from nurses (n = 960) and patients (n = 1315) in 71 surgical units from 26 acute hospitals (2009). Data were collected using two ICS and analysed descriptive and inferential statistics. Differences in patients? and nurses? assessments of individualised care were found between each country. Nurses assessed that they supported patient individuality more often. The Meann ranged from 3.61 (Greece)-4.31 (Hungary) and the Meanp ranged from 3.05 (Greece)-3.79 (Cyprus). To a large extent the care provided was individualised as defined by the Meann 3.75 (Greece)-4.36 (Hungary) and the Meanp 3.41 (Greece)-4.18 (Cyprus). In Cyprus and Finland, patients? assessed the individuality in their care corresponded well with nurses? assessments. Clear between-country differences in patients? and nurses? assessments were found in both subscale

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FQ - Veřejné zdravotnictví, sociální lékařství

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2012

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Clinical Nursing

ISSN

0962-1067

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

21

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

7-8

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

13

Strana od-do

1155-1167

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—