Twins and the paradox of dental-age estimations: A caution for researchers and clinicians
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17110%2F14%3AA1501BSI" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17110/14:A1501BSI - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Twins and the paradox of dental-age estimations: A caution for researchers and clinicians
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The biological age difference among twins is frequently an issue in studies of genetic influence on various dental features, particularly dental development. The timing of dental development is a crucial issue also for many clinicians and researchers. The aim of this study was therefore to verify within groups of twins how dental development differs, by applying Demirjian's method, Mincer's charts of development of third molars and two of Cameriere's methods for dental age estimation, which are among the most popular methods both in the clinical and the forensic scenario. The sample consisted of 64 twin pairs: 21 monozygotic, 30 dizygotic same-sex and 13 dizygotic opposite-sex with an age range between 5.8 and 22.6 years. Dental age was determined fromradiographs using the mentioned methods. Results showed that dental age of monozygotic twins is not identical even if they share all their genes.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Twins and the paradox of dental-age estimations: A caution for researchers and clinicians
Popis výsledku anglicky
The biological age difference among twins is frequently an issue in studies of genetic influence on various dental features, particularly dental development. The timing of dental development is a crucial issue also for many clinicians and researchers. The aim of this study was therefore to verify within groups of twins how dental development differs, by applying Demirjian's method, Mincer's charts of development of third molars and two of Cameriere's methods for dental age estimation, which are among the most popular methods both in the clinical and the forensic scenario. The sample consisted of 64 twin pairs: 21 monozygotic, 30 dizygotic same-sex and 13 dizygotic opposite-sex with an age range between 5.8 and 22.6 years. Dental age was determined fromradiographs using the mentioned methods. Results showed that dental age of monozygotic twins is not identical even if they share all their genes.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
AC - Archeologie, antropologie, etnologie
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2014
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
HOMO-JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE HUMAN BIOLOGY
ISSN
0018-442X
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
65
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
4
Stát vydavatele periodika
DE - Spolková republika Německo
Počet stran výsledku
8
Strana od-do
330-337
Kód UT WoS článku
000339644100006
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—