Validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales: review

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17110%2F14%3AA1501D8S" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17110/14:A1501D8S - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales: review

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The aim of the review was to determine the predictive validity of selected pressure ulcer risk assessment scales. Prediction of a risk of pressure ulcers is a priority issue in nursing. In the foreign literature, there are currently lots of research studies dealing with the validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales. Methods: The data sources were articles in three licenced, free and electronic databases. The inclusion criteria were met by fifteen studies on the validity of the Braden, Norton, Waterlow Scale, Song and Choi, Cubbin and Jackson, Modified Norton, EVARUCI, Suriadi and Sanada and Modified Braden scales. Conclusion: There is a need for examining the predictive validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales in our clinical setting and comparing the results with foreign studies. Before examining the predictive validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales, their proper and consistent translation is needed, according to recognized methodology.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales: review

Popis výsledku anglicky

The aim of the review was to determine the predictive validity of selected pressure ulcer risk assessment scales. Prediction of a risk of pressure ulcers is a priority issue in nursing. In the foreign literature, there are currently lots of research studies dealing with the validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales. Methods: The data sources were articles in three licenced, free and electronic databases. The inclusion criteria were met by fifteen studies on the validity of the Braden, Norton, Waterlow Scale, Song and Choi, Cubbin and Jackson, Modified Norton, EVARUCI, Suriadi and Sanada and Modified Braden scales. Conclusion: There is a need for examining the predictive validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales in our clinical setting and comparing the results with foreign studies. Before examining the predictive validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales, their proper and consistent translation is needed, according to recognized methodology.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AQ - Bezpečnost a ochrana zdraví, člověk – stroj

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery

ISSN

2336-3517

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

5

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

8

Strana od-do

85-92

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—