The impact of endoscopic harvesting methods on graft patency in CABG patients

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17110%2F16%3AA1701J7N" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17110/16:A1701J7N - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The impact of endoscopic harvesting methods on graft patency in CABG patients

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Endoscopic harvesting of venous grafts (EVH) is a progressive and developing technique in the area of surgical treatment of ischemic heart disease. The main reason for the increasing frequency of its use is the decrease of postoperative pain, lower rate of early infectious complications, lesser swelling of the operated extremity, lower incidence of haematomas, earlier mobilization of the patient, and greater patient satisfaction with the cosmetic effect. These advantages of EVH have been repeatedly confi rmed in numerous studies, and it may be regarded as undisputable that, as far as short-term outcomes are concerned, EVH is much better than open vein harvesting (OVH). As far as medium-term results are concerned, at present we have a suffi cient number of studies proving comparable results of EVH and OVH. The main controversy persists regarding the long-term results of the EVH technique, where we lack a suffi cient amount of data in order to be able to prove identical or better outcomes of EVH, when compared with the OVH technique. &#169; Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The impact of endoscopic harvesting methods on graft patency in CABG patients

Popis výsledku anglicky

Endoscopic harvesting of venous grafts (EVH) is a progressive and developing technique in the area of surgical treatment of ischemic heart disease. The main reason for the increasing frequency of its use is the decrease of postoperative pain, lower rate of early infectious complications, lesser swelling of the operated extremity, lower incidence of haematomas, earlier mobilization of the patient, and greater patient satisfaction with the cosmetic effect. These advantages of EVH have been repeatedly confi rmed in numerous studies, and it may be regarded as undisputable that, as far as short-term outcomes are concerned, EVH is much better than open vein harvesting (OVH). As far as medium-term results are concerned, at present we have a suffi cient number of studies proving comparable results of EVH and OVH. The main controversy persists regarding the long-term results of the EVH technique, where we lack a suffi cient amount of data in order to be able to prove identical or better outcomes of EVH, when compared with the OVH technique. &#169; Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

FJ - Chirurgie včetně transplantologie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Coronary Graft Failure: State of the Art

ISBN

9783319265155

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

47-52

Počet stran knihy

760

Název nakladatele

Springer International Publishing

Místo vydání

London

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—