Past and Present ARDS Mortality Rates: A Systematic Review
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17110%2F17%3AA1801EIV" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17110/17:A1801EIV - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/61383082:_____/17:00000286 RIV/00216208:11110/17:10361762 RIV/00843989:_____/17:E0106077
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4187/respcare.04716" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.4187/respcare.04716</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4187/respcare.04716" target="_blank" >10.4187/respcare.04716</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Past and Present ARDS Mortality Rates: A Systematic Review
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
ARDS is severe form of respiratory failure with significant impact on the morbidity and mortality of critical care patients. Epidemiological data are crucial for evaluating the efficacy of therapeutic interventions, designing studies, and optimizing resource distribution. The goal of this review is to present general aspects of mortality data published over the past decades. A systematic search of the MEDLINE/PubMed was performed. The articles were divided according to their methodology, type of reported mortality, and time. The main outcome was mortality. Extracted data included study duration, number of patients, and number of centers. The mortality trends and current mortality were calculated for subgroups consisting of in-hospital, ICU, 28/30-d, and 60-d mortality over 3 time periods (A, before 1995; B, 1995-2000; C, after 2000). The retrospectivity and prospectivity were also taken into account. Moreover, we present the most recent mortality rates since 2010. One hundred seventy-seven articles were included in the final analysis. General mortality rates ranged from 11 to 87% in studies including subjects with ARDS of all etiologies (mixed group). Linear regression revealed that the study design (28/30-d or 60-d) significantly influenced the mortality rate. Reported mortality rates were higher in prospective studies, such as randomized controlled trials and prospective observational studies compared with retrospective observational studies. Mortality rates exhibited a linear decrease in relation to time period (P <.001). The number of centers showed a significant negative correlation with mortality rates.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Past and Present ARDS Mortality Rates: A Systematic Review
Popis výsledku anglicky
ARDS is severe form of respiratory failure with significant impact on the morbidity and mortality of critical care patients. Epidemiological data are crucial for evaluating the efficacy of therapeutic interventions, designing studies, and optimizing resource distribution. The goal of this review is to present general aspects of mortality data published over the past decades. A systematic search of the MEDLINE/PubMed was performed. The articles were divided according to their methodology, type of reported mortality, and time. The main outcome was mortality. Extracted data included study duration, number of patients, and number of centers. The mortality trends and current mortality were calculated for subgroups consisting of in-hospital, ICU, 28/30-d, and 60-d mortality over 3 time periods (A, before 1995; B, 1995-2000; C, after 2000). The retrospectivity and prospectivity were also taken into account. Moreover, we present the most recent mortality rates since 2010. One hundred seventy-seven articles were included in the final analysis. General mortality rates ranged from 11 to 87% in studies including subjects with ARDS of all etiologies (mixed group). Linear regression revealed that the study design (28/30-d or 60-d) significantly influenced the mortality rate. Reported mortality rates were higher in prospective studies, such as randomized controlled trials and prospective observational studies compared with retrospective observational studies. Mortality rates exhibited a linear decrease in relation to time period (P <.001). The number of centers showed a significant negative correlation with mortality rates.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30221 - Critical care medicine and Emergency medicine
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2017
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Respiratory Care
ISSN
0020-1324
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
62
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
113-122
Kód UT WoS článku
000390427500015
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85016144789