Meek micrografting technique and its use in the treatment of severe burn injuries at the university hospital ostrava burn center

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17110%2F17%3AA1801TPQ" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17110/17:A1801TPQ - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00843989:_____/17:E0106541

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Meek micrografting technique and its use in the treatment of severe burn injuries at the university hospital ostrava burn center

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Background: Early necrectomy and skin autotransplantation are prerequisites for successful treatment of extensive burns. Insufficient autograft donor site availability is a limiting factor. The Meek micrografting technique, published by C. P. Meek in 1958, appears to be a potential solution. Skin grafts are cut into micrografts and expanded at a ratio of 1:3, 1:4, 1:6 or 1:9. Thus, even in cases with limited donor site availability, it is possible to cover large areas after necrectomy. Material and Methods: Meek micrografting was first used at the University Hospital Ostrava Burns Centre in 2013. To date, 14 operations have been performed in 4 patients with extensive burn trauma. Engraftment, healing rate, and subsequent scarring (with a particular focus on scar contracture formation) were observed postoperatively. Results: The average micrograft success rate was 86.5%. The best success rates were observed in areas with deferred transplantation after necrectomy. Hypertrophic scarring occurred in both Meek and meshed transplant areas. No scar contractures requiring surgical management developed in micrografted areas. Surgical scar contracture release was required in 1 patient who underwent meshed graft transplantation. Discussion: The Meek technique demonstrated significant advantages. Micrografts can be prepared with very small skin grafts, which is impossible with the mesh technique. Meshed grafts with expansion ratios of 1:3 or higher require allograft or xenograft coverage. In our experience, overlays were not necessary for micrografts with a 1:6 expansion ratio. Given that no serious scar contractures developed in micrografted areas, we speculate that micrografts may pose a lower risk for their development when compared to meshed grafts. The disadvantage of the Meek technique is greater economic demands. Conclusion: Meek micrografting is effective in the surgical management of deep burns in extensive thermal injuries with limited donor site availability...

Název v anglickém jazyce

Meek micrografting technique and its use in the treatment of severe burn injuries at the university hospital ostrava burn center

Popis výsledku anglicky

Background: Early necrectomy and skin autotransplantation are prerequisites for successful treatment of extensive burns. Insufficient autograft donor site availability is a limiting factor. The Meek micrografting technique, published by C. P. Meek in 1958, appears to be a potential solution. Skin grafts are cut into micrografts and expanded at a ratio of 1:3, 1:4, 1:6 or 1:9. Thus, even in cases with limited donor site availability, it is possible to cover large areas after necrectomy. Material and Methods: Meek micrografting was first used at the University Hospital Ostrava Burns Centre in 2013. To date, 14 operations have been performed in 4 patients with extensive burn trauma. Engraftment, healing rate, and subsequent scarring (with a particular focus on scar contracture formation) were observed postoperatively. Results: The average micrograft success rate was 86.5%. The best success rates were observed in areas with deferred transplantation after necrectomy. Hypertrophic scarring occurred in both Meek and meshed transplant areas. No scar contractures requiring surgical management developed in micrografted areas. Surgical scar contracture release was required in 1 patient who underwent meshed graft transplantation. Discussion: The Meek technique demonstrated significant advantages. Micrografts can be prepared with very small skin grafts, which is impossible with the mesh technique. Meshed grafts with expansion ratios of 1:3 or higher require allograft or xenograft coverage. In our experience, overlays were not necessary for micrografts with a 1:6 expansion ratio. Given that no serious scar contractures developed in micrografted areas, we speculate that micrografts may pose a lower risk for their development when compared to meshed grafts. The disadvantage of the Meek technique is greater economic demands. Conclusion: Meek micrografting is effective in the surgical management of deep burns in extensive thermal injuries with limited donor site availability...

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30212 - Surgery

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2017

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Acta Chirurgiae Plasticae

ISSN

0001-5423

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

59

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

11-17

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85029006471