Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic fluid collections - 6 years' experience at a tertiary referral gastroenterological center in a period 2006-2012

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17110%2F17%3AA1901ZHA" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17110/17:A1901ZHA - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.14735/amgh2017199" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.14735/amgh2017199</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.14735/amgh2017199" target="_blank" >10.14735/amgh2017199</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic fluid collections - 6 years' experience at a tertiary referral gastroenterological center in a period 2006-2012

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Introduction: Walled-off pancreatic fluid collections, that are categorized as pancreatic pseudocysts and walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN), arise as complications of acute or chronic pancreatitis. Endoscopic transmural drainage (ETD) is the current method of choice for the treatment of symptomatic walled-off pancreatic fluid collections. Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from patients who underwent an ETD at a tertiary referral gastroenterological center during a 6-year interval was performed. The technical, short- and long-term clinical success of ETD of walled-off pancreatic fluid collections was evaluated. The effectiveness of ETD performed with two types of endoscopes, with a duodenoscope (CTD - conventional transmural drainage) and with an echoendoscope (EUD - endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage), was also compared. The choice of technique was at the discretion of the endoscopist performing the procedure. Results: In a cohort of 54 patients with a symptomatic pseudocyst or WOPN, the overall technical success rate of ETD was 94.4%, and this did not differ between EUD (100%) and CTD (88.6%) when the appropriate technique was selected (p = 0.104). Complications occurred in 31.5% of the patients, with no difference found between CTD and EUD (38.5 vs. 25%; p = 0.382). Clinical success persisted 3 months after stent insertion in 92.5% of patients with initial technical success of ETD and 6 months after stent extraction in 88.6% of the patients with clinical success 3 months after stent insertion. No difference was observed between EUD and CTD (3 months after stent insertion: 90.5 vs. 94.8%; p = 1.0; 6 months after stent extraction: 100 vs. 77.8%; p = 0.104). Of 51 patients with initial technical success, the therapeutic effect 6 months after stent extraction was 62.7%. Conclusion: In a cohort of 54 patients, the technical success, short-term and long-term clinical success of ETD of walled-off pancreatic fluid collections was 94.4, 92.5 and 88.6%, respectively. Endoscopic ultrasound plays an important role in this therapy when gastric varices or a non-bulging fluid collection is involved. Furthermore, no difference was observed between EUD and CTD in terms of technical and clinical success when the appropriate technique was selected.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic fluid collections - 6 years' experience at a tertiary referral gastroenterological center in a period 2006-2012

Popis výsledku anglicky

Introduction: Walled-off pancreatic fluid collections, that are categorized as pancreatic pseudocysts and walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN), arise as complications of acute or chronic pancreatitis. Endoscopic transmural drainage (ETD) is the current method of choice for the treatment of symptomatic walled-off pancreatic fluid collections. Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from patients who underwent an ETD at a tertiary referral gastroenterological center during a 6-year interval was performed. The technical, short- and long-term clinical success of ETD of walled-off pancreatic fluid collections was evaluated. The effectiveness of ETD performed with two types of endoscopes, with a duodenoscope (CTD - conventional transmural drainage) and with an echoendoscope (EUD - endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage), was also compared. The choice of technique was at the discretion of the endoscopist performing the procedure. Results: In a cohort of 54 patients with a symptomatic pseudocyst or WOPN, the overall technical success rate of ETD was 94.4%, and this did not differ between EUD (100%) and CTD (88.6%) when the appropriate technique was selected (p = 0.104). Complications occurred in 31.5% of the patients, with no difference found between CTD and EUD (38.5 vs. 25%; p = 0.382). Clinical success persisted 3 months after stent insertion in 92.5% of patients with initial technical success of ETD and 6 months after stent extraction in 88.6% of the patients with clinical success 3 months after stent insertion. No difference was observed between EUD and CTD (3 months after stent insertion: 90.5 vs. 94.8%; p = 1.0; 6 months after stent extraction: 100 vs. 77.8%; p = 0.104). Of 51 patients with initial technical success, the therapeutic effect 6 months after stent extraction was 62.7%. Conclusion: In a cohort of 54 patients, the technical success, short-term and long-term clinical success of ETD of walled-off pancreatic fluid collections was 94.4, 92.5 and 88.6%, respectively. Endoscopic ultrasound plays an important role in this therapy when gastric varices or a non-bulging fluid collection is involved. Furthermore, no difference was observed between EUD and CTD in terms of technical and clinical success when the appropriate technique was selected.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30219 - Gastroenterology and hepatology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2017

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Gastroenterologie a Hepatologie

ISSN

1804-7874

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

71

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

9

Strana od-do

199-207

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85022040537