Five-year results of vocal fold augmentation using autologous fat or calcium hydroxylapatite
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17110%2F21%3AA220271K" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17110/21:A220271K - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00843989:_____/21:E0108927
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00405-020-06479-6" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00405-020-06479-6</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06479-6" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00405-020-06479-6</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Five-year results of vocal fold augmentation using autologous fat or calcium hydroxylapatite
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Purpose To evaluate 5-year voice outcomes of vocal fold augmentation (VFA) using autologous fat (AF) injection via direct microlaryngoscopy versus office-based calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA) injection. Methods Retrospective study of patients who underwent VFA between 2012 and 2015, with a 5-year follow-up. Patients with a glottic gap of <= 3 mm caused by unilateral vocal fold paralysis or vocal fold atrophy were included in the study. VFA was performed using AF injection via direct microlaryngoscopy in 17 patients, and using office-based CaHA injection in 19 patients. Subjective satisfaction with voice, voice handicap index (VHI), and maximal phonation time (MPT) were analyzed pre-injection, and at 12 and 60 months post-VFA. Results Altogether 36 patients underwent VFA between 2012 and 2015, of whom 5 were excluded within 1 year post-VFA, and 2 were excluded between 1 and 5 years post-VFA. Of the remaining 29 patients, 3 (10.3%) underwent re-intervention at between 1 and 3 years post-VFA. Thus, the 5-year follow-up included 26 patients (72.2%; 11 males and 15 females). At 5 years after surgery, 73.1% of the patients were satisfied with their voice, with no significant between-group difference (P = 0.307). The mean improvement of VHI was 28.8 +/- 17.82 in the autologous fat group versus 33 +/- 26.24 in the CaHA group (P = 0.458). MPT improvement was also similar between the two groups: 6.2 +/- 4.26 for the autologous fat group versus 6.3 +/- 4.34 for the CaHA group (P = 0.667). Conclusions Both AF injection via direct microlaryngoscopy and office-based CaHA injection yielded good and comparable 5-year results.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Five-year results of vocal fold augmentation using autologous fat or calcium hydroxylapatite
Popis výsledku anglicky
Purpose To evaluate 5-year voice outcomes of vocal fold augmentation (VFA) using autologous fat (AF) injection via direct microlaryngoscopy versus office-based calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA) injection. Methods Retrospective study of patients who underwent VFA between 2012 and 2015, with a 5-year follow-up. Patients with a glottic gap of <= 3 mm caused by unilateral vocal fold paralysis or vocal fold atrophy were included in the study. VFA was performed using AF injection via direct microlaryngoscopy in 17 patients, and using office-based CaHA injection in 19 patients. Subjective satisfaction with voice, voice handicap index (VHI), and maximal phonation time (MPT) were analyzed pre-injection, and at 12 and 60 months post-VFA. Results Altogether 36 patients underwent VFA between 2012 and 2015, of whom 5 were excluded within 1 year post-VFA, and 2 were excluded between 1 and 5 years post-VFA. Of the remaining 29 patients, 3 (10.3%) underwent re-intervention at between 1 and 3 years post-VFA. Thus, the 5-year follow-up included 26 patients (72.2%; 11 males and 15 females). At 5 years after surgery, 73.1% of the patients were satisfied with their voice, with no significant between-group difference (P = 0.307). The mean improvement of VHI was 28.8 +/- 17.82 in the autologous fat group versus 33 +/- 26.24 in the CaHA group (P = 0.458). MPT improvement was also similar between the two groups: 6.2 +/- 4.26 for the autologous fat group versus 6.3 +/- 4.34 for the CaHA group (P = 0.667). Conclusions Both AF injection via direct microlaryngoscopy and office-based CaHA injection yielded good and comparable 5-year results.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30206 - Otorhinolaryngology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
EUR ARCH OTO-RHINO-L
ISSN
0937-4477
e-ISSN
1434-4726
Svazek periodika
278
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
4
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
6
Strana od-do
1139-1144
Kód UT WoS článku
000591988800003
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—