Indicating dating accuracy by personal events ratings: Differences between self-reports and proxy-reports

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17250%2F18%3AA2202EAJ" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17250/18:A2202EAJ - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/61989592:15210/18:73598984

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://phdexistence.cz/ke-stazeni/" target="_blank" >https://phdexistence.cz/ke-stazeni/</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Indicating dating accuracy by personal events ratings: Differences between self-reports and proxy-reports

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Quality of self-reports and proxy reports for personal events are examined. 78 couples (age 23 to 40 years old) were separately interviewed and provided the ratings of 22 or less events. The role of one partner (respondent) was to date personal events (exact date) and also to provide ratings of subjective characteristics such as confidence in date estimate, event importance or amount of sharing the event. The role of the other partner (proxy) was to keep an online diary (for six weeks) about events from their partner’s life (or life of the whole family) and provide the same ratings but from their partner’s perspective. The results show similarities and differences of both reports suggesting that proxies’ have some valuable interpersonal knowledge of unique personal events of their partners, though this knowledge is usually quite limited and only occasionally superior—e.g., may not suffer from social desirability as much as respondents’ reports.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Indicating dating accuracy by personal events ratings: Differences between self-reports and proxy-reports

Popis výsledku anglicky

Quality of self-reports and proxy reports for personal events are examined. 78 couples (age 23 to 40 years old) were separately interviewed and provided the ratings of 22 or less events. The role of one partner (respondent) was to date personal events (exact date) and also to provide ratings of subjective characteristics such as confidence in date estimate, event importance or amount of sharing the event. The role of the other partner (proxy) was to keep an online diary (for six weeks) about events from their partner’s life (or life of the whole family) and provide the same ratings but from their partner’s perspective. The results show similarities and differences of both reports suggesting that proxies’ have some valuable interpersonal knowledge of unique personal events of their partners, though this knowledge is usually quite limited and only occasionally superior—e.g., may not suffer from social desirability as much as respondents’ reports.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50100 - Psychology and cognitive sciences

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

PhD existence 2018. ?Nekonečno v psychologii?. Česko-slovenská psychologická konference (nejen) pro doktorandy a o doktorandech.

ISBN

978-80-244-5339-2

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

20

Strana od-do

69-78

Název nakladatele

Univerzita Palackého.

Místo vydání

Olomouc

Místo konání akce

Olomouc

Datum konání akce

1. 1. 2018

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

EUR - Evropská akce

Kód UT WoS článku

000510150800008