Industrialisation, Domestic Work and Domestic Industry in the Bohemian Lands at the Turn of the 20th Century
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17250%2F24%3AA250388Q" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17250/24:A250388Q - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://dokumenty.osu.cz/ff/journals/historica/2024-1/Historica_2024_1_Popelka.pdf" target="_blank" >https://dokumenty.osu.cz/ff/journals/historica/2024-1/Historica_2024_1_Popelka.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.15452/historica.2024.15.0004" target="_blank" >10.15452/historica.2024.15.0004</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Industrialisation, Domestic Work and Domestic Industry in the Bohemian Lands at the Turn of the 20th Century
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Economic historians have paid due attention to the phenomenon of domestic work, especially in connection with the theory of proto industrialisation, for decades. However, domestic production has not been a marginal issue even in those economies of European countries that can be considered industrialised. The phenomenon of domestic industry was significant in the Bohemian lands as well as in some other countries of the Habsburg monarchy (e.g. Vorarlberg and Galicia) or East and Southeast Europe until the turn of the 20th century. Both the industrial and protoindustrial forms of production coexisted in the society of Central Europe for a relatively long time. This is what Witold Kula called “the coexistence of anachronisms”. This study focuses on the causes of the persistence of protoindustrial forms of production, their field structure, and gender aspects, as well as on the comparison of data from official statistics and from the period press. Specific examples present domestic work not only as a social problem but also as a strategy to earn a living mainly for country people.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Industrialisation, Domestic Work and Domestic Industry in the Bohemian Lands at the Turn of the 20th Century
Popis výsledku anglicky
Economic historians have paid due attention to the phenomenon of domestic work, especially in connection with the theory of proto industrialisation, for decades. However, domestic production has not been a marginal issue even in those economies of European countries that can be considered industrialised. The phenomenon of domestic industry was significant in the Bohemian lands as well as in some other countries of the Habsburg monarchy (e.g. Vorarlberg and Galicia) or East and Southeast Europe until the turn of the 20th century. Both the industrial and protoindustrial forms of production coexisted in the society of Central Europe for a relatively long time. This is what Witold Kula called “the coexistence of anachronisms”. This study focuses on the causes of the persistence of protoindustrial forms of production, their field structure, and gender aspects, as well as on the comparison of data from official statistics and from the period press. Specific examples present domestic work not only as a social problem but also as a strategy to earn a living mainly for country people.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60101 - History (history of science and technology to be 6.3, history of specific sciences to be under the respective headings)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Historica. Revue pro historii a příbuzné vědy
ISSN
1803-7550
e-ISSN
2695-060X
Svazek periodika
—
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
23
Strana od-do
58-80
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85199756568