The Second Hungarian Conquest of the Carpathian Basin High Modernism and the Ecological Crisis in the Eastern Half of the Habsburg Empire during the Nineteenth Century

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17250%2F24%3AA25038LP" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17250/24:A25038LP - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://read.dukeupress.edu/agricultural-history/article/98/1/50/386122/The-Second-Hungarian-Conquest-of-the-Carpathian" target="_blank" >https://read.dukeupress.edu/agricultural-history/article/98/1/50/386122/The-Second-Hungarian-Conquest-of-the-Carpathian</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00021482-10910303" target="_blank" >10.1215/00021482-10910303</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Second Hungarian Conquest of the Carpathian Basin High Modernism and the Ecological Crisis in the Eastern Half of the Habsburg Empire during the Nineteenth Century

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

During the nineteenth century many European scientists shared the view that a nation could compete successfully if only it improved its landscape via new infrastructures, such as large reclamation and river regulation projects, and via the intensive use of natural resources—for example, the scientifically planned use of forests. This “high” modernization path orchestrated by the political and scientific elites of Hungary sought to consolidate control over resources, landscapes, and competing ethnic groups and was in many respects similar to the many other versions of high modernism in Europe at the time. This version, however, represented a particular vision closely linked to the ecological systems of the Middle Danube area. Although questions of the political, economic, and technological “rise” of Hungary have attracted scholarly attention for centuries, historians have not fully explored the ecological consequences of modernization. Three of these consequences—deforestation, desertification, and flooding—are the subjects of this article. More broadly, the article aims to show how the political and economic goals of nationalism produced a science of ecological domination.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Second Hungarian Conquest of the Carpathian Basin High Modernism and the Ecological Crisis in the Eastern Half of the Habsburg Empire during the Nineteenth Century

Popis výsledku anglicky

During the nineteenth century many European scientists shared the view that a nation could compete successfully if only it improved its landscape via new infrastructures, such as large reclamation and river regulation projects, and via the intensive use of natural resources—for example, the scientifically planned use of forests. This “high” modernization path orchestrated by the political and scientific elites of Hungary sought to consolidate control over resources, landscapes, and competing ethnic groups and was in many respects similar to the many other versions of high modernism in Europe at the time. This version, however, represented a particular vision closely linked to the ecological systems of the Middle Danube area. Although questions of the political, economic, and technological “rise” of Hungary have attracted scholarly attention for centuries, historians have not fully explored the ecological consequences of modernization. Three of these consequences—deforestation, desertification, and flooding—are the subjects of this article. More broadly, the article aims to show how the political and economic goals of nationalism produced a science of ecological domination.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60100 - History and Archaeology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/EF18_053%2F0017856" target="_blank" >EF18_053/0017856: Posílení vědeckých kapacit OU II</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Agricultural History

ISSN

0002-1482

e-ISSN

1533-8290

Svazek periodika

—

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

21

Strana od-do

50-70

Kód UT WoS článku

001292003700003

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85165685839