Ortega y Gasset’s Early Philosophy of History: Metahistory and Historiology

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17250%2F24%3AA2503A22" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17250/24:A2503A22 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://kfi.zcu.cz/veda-vyzkum/kudej/" target="_blank" >https://kfi.zcu.cz/veda-vyzkum/kudej/</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Ortega y Gasset’s Early Philosophy of History: Metahistory and Historiology

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This expository study traces the early thoughts of Ortega y Gasset in the philosophy of history. Chronologically, it first presents Ortega’s statement of the existence of historical reality and his demand for the establishment of a new discipline of metahistory to question the presuppositions of his¬torical investigation. Dissatisfaction with the existing form of history later leads Ortega to attempt to develop it into a scientific discipline, for which he proposes his historiology to formulate general models for the practice of the humanities. As specific models, the philosopher elaborates the schema of generation and crisis. Both metahistory and historiology are subsumed under the theory of historical reason in the author’s later works. The philos¬opher’s contribution to the philosophy of history uniquely combines vitalist speculation with a then innovative positivist methodology.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Ortega y Gasset’s Early Philosophy of History: Metahistory and Historiology

Popis výsledku anglicky

This expository study traces the early thoughts of Ortega y Gasset in the philosophy of history. Chronologically, it first presents Ortega’s statement of the existence of historical reality and his demand for the establishment of a new discipline of metahistory to question the presuppositions of his¬torical investigation. Dissatisfaction with the existing form of history later leads Ortega to attempt to develop it into a scientific discipline, for which he proposes his historiology to formulate general models for the practice of the humanities. As specific models, the philosopher elaborates the schema of generation and crisis. Both metahistory and historiology are subsumed under the theory of historical reason in the author’s later works. The philos¬opher’s contribution to the philosophy of history uniquely combines vitalist speculation with a then innovative positivist methodology.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Kuděj: časopis pro kulturní dějiny

ISSN

1211-8109

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

—

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

17

Strana od-do

45-61

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—