Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Hypothesis Testing and Knowledge of the Human Past

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17250%2F25%3AA2603B21" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17250/25:A2603B21 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://www.sav.sk/index.php?lang=sk&doc=journal-list&part=article_response_page&journal_article_no=38626" target="_blank" >https://www.sav.sk/index.php?lang=sk&doc=journal-list&part=article_response_page&journal_article_no=38626</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2025.32203" target="_blank" >10.31577/orgf.2025.32203</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Hypothesis Testing and Knowledge of the Human Past

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Historians and natural scientists are adept at inferring knowledge of the past from present traces and evidence. The repository of available methods has been rapidly expanding, and historians of the human past have learned that using techniques developed in other fields that study the natural past might prove beneficial to their endeavours in some cases. The network of inferences involved in historical discourse is vast and diverse. Influential philosophers of history and historical sciences like Jouni-Matti Kuukkanen and Aviezer Tucker have argued that it is necessary to expand the scope of the philosophy of history and to take a deeper look at underlying reasoning and inferential structure of history. This paper answers this call by analysing a group of inferences in human historiography that could be described in terms of hypothesis and hypothesis testing. Hypothesis testing has received some attention in the philosophy of historical sciences, but it is mostly underexplored in the philosophy of history in the context of human history. The paper examines four case studies and analyses their inferential structures by using concepts from the philosophy of historical sciences, such as trace-based and analogous reasoning, type/token distinction, etc. It will be shown that hypothesis testing helps generate knowledge about the past, but to fully appreciate it and to differentiate its types, philosophers of history must engage with the infrastructure of historical research.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Hypothesis Testing and Knowledge of the Human Past

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Historians and natural scientists are adept at inferring knowledge of the past from present traces and evidence. The repository of available methods has been rapidly expanding, and historians of the human past have learned that using techniques developed in other fields that study the natural past might prove beneficial to their endeavours in some cases. The network of inferences involved in historical discourse is vast and diverse. Influential philosophers of history and historical sciences like Jouni-Matti Kuukkanen and Aviezer Tucker have argued that it is necessary to expand the scope of the philosophy of history and to take a deeper look at underlying reasoning and inferential structure of history. This paper answers this call by analysing a group of inferences in human historiography that could be described in terms of hypothesis and hypothesis testing. Hypothesis testing has received some attention in the philosophy of historical sciences, but it is mostly underexplored in the philosophy of history in the context of human history. The paper examines four case studies and analyses their inferential structures by using concepts from the philosophy of historical sciences, such as trace-based and analogous reasoning, type/token distinction, etc. It will be shown that hypothesis testing helps generate knowledge about the past, but to fully appreciate it and to differentiate its types, philosophers of history must engage with the infrastructure of historical research.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    <a href="/cs/project/GA23-05800S" target="_blank" >GA23-05800S: Velká historie a její filozofický potenciál</a><br>

  • Návaznosti

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2025

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Organon F

  • ISSN

    1335-0668

  • e-ISSN

    2585-7150

  • Svazek periodika

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    2

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    SK - Slovenská republika

  • Počet stran výsledku

    25

  • Strana od-do

    168-192

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    001509115800003

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-105009279846