How difficult is it to reintroduce a dragonfly? Fifteen years monitoring Leucorrhinia dubia at the receiving site
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17310%2F18%3AA1901T4F" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17310/18:A1901T4F - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/67985904:_____/18:00489493
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320717314222" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320717314222</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.12.011" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.biocon.2017.12.011</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
How difficult is it to reintroduce a dragonfly? Fifteen years monitoring Leucorrhinia dubia at the receiving site
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The present study reports the long-term persistence of a population of Leucorrhinia dubia (Odonata: Libellulidae) reintroduced to artificially created bog pools in the Czech Republic. Eighty (pen)ultimate instar L. dubia larvae were translocated in 2001, and the dragonfly assemblage at the reintroduction site was monitored for 15 years following larvae release. In 2015-2017, the capture-mark-recapture method, the Jolly-Seber model, and exuviae collection were used to evaluate the demography of the translocated population. Microsatellite analysis was performed to assess the genetic variability of source and reintroduced populations. Over the monitored period, population size increased (80 larvae released vs. 108-115 exuviae and 75 adults at the end of the study) and L. dubia became a dominant species, whereas the composition and abundance of the local dragonfly assemblage were not substantially changed. These results indicate that reintroductions are effective measures for dragonfly conservation, as translocating a relatively small number of individuals led to the establishment of a self-sustaining population. Using (pen)ultimate instar larvae was optimal for dragonfly translocation, but the availability of a high-quality habitat and the active collaboration with nature conservation authorities were vital for the successful outcome. Genetic analysis suggested that the translocated population might serve as a source of genetic variation for the original population, if depleted.
Název v anglickém jazyce
How difficult is it to reintroduce a dragonfly? Fifteen years monitoring Leucorrhinia dubia at the receiving site
Popis výsledku anglicky
The present study reports the long-term persistence of a population of Leucorrhinia dubia (Odonata: Libellulidae) reintroduced to artificially created bog pools in the Czech Republic. Eighty (pen)ultimate instar L. dubia larvae were translocated in 2001, and the dragonfly assemblage at the reintroduction site was monitored for 15 years following larvae release. In 2015-2017, the capture-mark-recapture method, the Jolly-Seber model, and exuviae collection were used to evaluate the demography of the translocated population. Microsatellite analysis was performed to assess the genetic variability of source and reintroduced populations. Over the monitored period, population size increased (80 larvae released vs. 108-115 exuviae and 75 adults at the end of the study) and L. dubia became a dominant species, whereas the composition and abundance of the local dragonfly assemblage were not substantially changed. These results indicate that reintroductions are effective measures for dragonfly conservation, as translocating a relatively small number of individuals led to the establishment of a self-sustaining population. Using (pen)ultimate instar larvae was optimal for dragonfly translocation, but the availability of a high-quality habitat and the active collaboration with nature conservation authorities were vital for the successful outcome. Genetic analysis suggested that the translocated population might serve as a source of genetic variation for the original population, if depleted.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10619 - Biodiversity conservation
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/LO1208" target="_blank" >LO1208: Teoretické aspekty energetického zpracování odpadů a ochrany prostředí před negativními dopady</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2018
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
BIOL CONSERV
ISSN
0006-3207
e-ISSN
1873-2917
Svazek periodika
218
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
8
Strana od-do
110-117
Kód UT WoS článku
000424177400014
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85038611226