Framing fragmentation in strategic policy documents of spatial planning and environmental domains: differences and similarities
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17310%2F19%3AA2001YGS" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17310/19:A2001YGS - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2019.1589433" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2019.1589433</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2019.1589433" target="_blank" >10.1080/09640568.2019.1589433</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Framing fragmentation in strategic policy documents of spatial planning and environmental domains: differences and similarities
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Fragmentation is a complex issue and the way it is framed will impact policy decisions. The Czech Republic has adopted several strategic policy documents in spatial planning and environmental domains that address fragmentation. However, these documents differ in how they frame fragmentation. Our goal was to evaluate the differences in 1) framing the problem of fragmentation and 2) suggested solutions. We performed a content analysis of the strategic policy documents by coding text using the key fragmentation aspects - biological organization, land cover, and connectivity. Next, we categorized data either to Species-oriented, Pattern-oriented, or Ecosystem service frames and suggested criteria to evaluate the quality of the framing. This method was useful to show the divergences in the framing of fragmentation as a problem between two policy domains. The results show that the Pattern oriented frame and mitigation solutions are the most prominent aspects, and also fragmentation is not well framed.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Framing fragmentation in strategic policy documents of spatial planning and environmental domains: differences and similarities
Popis výsledku anglicky
Fragmentation is a complex issue and the way it is framed will impact policy decisions. The Czech Republic has adopted several strategic policy documents in spatial planning and environmental domains that address fragmentation. However, these documents differ in how they frame fragmentation. Our goal was to evaluate the differences in 1) framing the problem of fragmentation and 2) suggested solutions. We performed a content analysis of the strategic policy documents by coding text using the key fragmentation aspects - biological organization, land cover, and connectivity. Next, we categorized data either to Species-oriented, Pattern-oriented, or Ecosystem service frames and suggested criteria to evaluate the quality of the framing. This method was useful to show the divergences in the framing of fragmentation as a problem between two policy domains. The results show that the Pattern oriented frame and mitigation solutions are the most prominent aspects, and also fragmentation is not well framed.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10511 - Environmental sciences (social aspects to be 5.7)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA16-02521S" target="_blank" >GA16-02521S: Individuální a organizační rozhodování v redukci environmentálních rizik: determinanty, motivace a efektivita</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2019
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
ISSN
0964-0568
e-ISSN
1360-0559
Svazek periodika
63
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
18
Strana od-do
1-18
Kód UT WoS článku
000470643800001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85064922469