Considerable congruence, enlightening conflict: molecular analysis largely supports morphology-based hypotheses on Cecidomyiidae (Diptera) phylogeny

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17310%2F19%3AA2001ZQC" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17310/19:A2001ZQC - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/185/1/98/5035132" target="_blank" >https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/185/1/98/5035132</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zly029" target="_blank" >10.1093/zoolinnean/zly029</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Considerable congruence, enlightening conflict: molecular analysis largely supports morphology-based hypotheses on Cecidomyiidae (Diptera) phylogeny

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The phylogeny of Cecidomyiidae (Diptera) is reconstructed based on the combined analysis of nine genetic markers(18S, 28S, EF1α, CAD1, CAD2, CAD5, 12S, 16S and COI). The resulting hypotheses are compared and contrasted with the morphology-based classification prevailing for the family. The monophyly of Cecidomyiidae is well supported, as is the monophyly of the subfamilies Lestremiinae, Catotrichinae and Cecidomyiinae. Molecular analysis shows Lestremiinae to be the earliest branching lineage, which is in conflict with the generally accepted idea of Catotrichinae having the most generalized morphology within Cecidomyiidae. Micromyinae, Winnertziinae and Porricondylinae are found here to be paraphyletic, owing to the segregation of subgroups whose position in the morphology-based classification has always been controversial. Examples of such problematic taxa are Catochini (usually classified in Micromyinae), Heteropezini and Diallactiini (both in Winnertziinae), and Dicerurini (in Porricondylinae). The clade comprising Porricondylinae + Cecidomyiinae (‘higher Cecidomyiidae’) is confirmed as monophyletic, and Dirhiza (a genus presently classified in Porricondylinae: Dicerurini) is hypothesized to be a sister group to Cecidomyiinae. Most of the current tribes are confirmed here as monophyletic, with notable exceptions being Diallactiini and Dicerurini. Although not a focal point of this study, the phylogeny reconstructed here of Cecidomyiinae is in good agreement with the morphology-based classification in use.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Considerable congruence, enlightening conflict: molecular analysis largely supports morphology-based hypotheses on Cecidomyiidae (Diptera) phylogeny

Popis výsledku anglicky

The phylogeny of Cecidomyiidae (Diptera) is reconstructed based on the combined analysis of nine genetic markers(18S, 28S, EF1α, CAD1, CAD2, CAD5, 12S, 16S and COI). The resulting hypotheses are compared and contrasted with the morphology-based classification prevailing for the family. The monophyly of Cecidomyiidae is well supported, as is the monophyly of the subfamilies Lestremiinae, Catotrichinae and Cecidomyiinae. Molecular analysis shows Lestremiinae to be the earliest branching lineage, which is in conflict with the generally accepted idea of Catotrichinae having the most generalized morphology within Cecidomyiidae. Micromyinae, Winnertziinae and Porricondylinae are found here to be paraphyletic, owing to the segregation of subgroups whose position in the morphology-based classification has always been controversial. Examples of such problematic taxa are Catochini (usually classified in Micromyinae), Heteropezini and Diallactiini (both in Winnertziinae), and Dicerurini (in Porricondylinae). The clade comprising Porricondylinae + Cecidomyiinae (‘higher Cecidomyiidae’) is confirmed as monophyletic, and Dirhiza (a genus presently classified in Porricondylinae: Dicerurini) is hypothesized to be a sister group to Cecidomyiinae. Most of the current tribes are confirmed here as monophyletic, with notable exceptions being Diallactiini and Dicerurini. Although not a focal point of this study, the phylogeny reconstructed here of Cecidomyiinae is in good agreement with the morphology-based classification in use.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10613 - Zoology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society

ISSN

0024-4082

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

185

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

13

Strana od-do

98-110

Kód UT WoS článku

000462194500004

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85066943011