Comparison of saturation flow method and expert system for optimizing traffic crossroads control

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17310%2F19%3AA20020IJ" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17310/19:A20020IJ - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CarpathianCC.2019.8765928" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CarpathianCC.2019.8765928</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CarpathianCC.2019.8765928" target="_blank" >10.1109/CarpathianCC.2019.8765928</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparison of saturation flow method and expert system for optimizing traffic crossroads control

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In this article we will focus on comparing the two methods for optimization of intersection control. First method is a saturation flow method, second method is an expert system that divides the time for each vehicle a given crossing direction based on expert knowledge. For both methods, simulations are created based on the real data of a selected crossroad in the city of Ostrava. Based on these simulations the methods are compared. Subsequently the comparison is evaluated together with a description of the advantages and disadvantages of the individual methods. The comparison is provided based on real traffic data of a selected crossroad in the city of Ostrava.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparison of saturation flow method and expert system for optimizing traffic crossroads control

Popis výsledku anglicky

In this article we will focus on comparing the two methods for optimization of intersection control. First method is a saturation flow method, second method is an expert system that divides the time for each vehicle a given crossing direction based on expert knowledge. For both methods, simulations are created based on the real data of a selected crossroad in the city of Ostrava. Based on these simulations the methods are compared. Subsequently the comparison is evaluated together with a description of the advantages and disadvantages of the individual methods. The comparison is provided based on real traffic data of a selected crossroad in the city of Ostrava.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

2019 20TH INTERNATIONAL CARPATHIAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ICCC)

ISBN

978-1-7281-0701-1

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

371-377

Název nakladatele

IEEE

Místo vydání

New York

Místo konání akce

Krakow

Datum konání akce

26. 5. 2019

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

000490570500076