How do various types of non-metropolitan regions react to economic shocks?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17310%2F19%3AA2002273" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17310/19:A2002273 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/338/1/012012/pdf" target="_blank" >https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/338/1/012012/pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/338/1/012012" target="_blank" >10.1088/1755-1315/338/1/012012</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

How do various types of non-metropolitan regions react to economic shocks?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

There have been many studies focused on regional resilience and its particular determinants at regional level such as population size, industry mix, specialization/diversity, firm size structure, export orientation or institutions. Our research question is: which types of regions are more resilient: metropolitan or non-metropolitan regions, urban cores or hinterlands, peripheral, branch plant or single factory regions? These questions were examined in our case study of post-crisis (2009-2014) economic development of Czech city-regions. We propose a typology of city-regions based on particularities in economic structure, key actors and mechanisms of development. Eight main categories of Czech city-regions were distinguished: metropolitan cores, metropolitan hinterlands, medium-sized urban regions with metropolitan functions, peripheral city- regions, single factory city-regions dominated by a large domestic manufacturing firm, 'ordinary' diversified industrial city-regions, lower and higher-tiered branch plant regions dominated mostly by foreign-owned manufacturing assembly plants. We conducted a quantitative analysis focused on differences among the above mentioned types of regions in the dynamics of post-crisis growth of value added and employment in agriculture, industry, construction and business services. Empirical results show that differences in resilience among particular types of regions were relatively small. Surprisingly, single-factory city-regions and higher-tiered branch plant regions exhibited the most rapid pace of recovery, while the metropolitan cores and hinterlands lagged behind significantly.

Název v anglickém jazyce

How do various types of non-metropolitan regions react to economic shocks?

Popis výsledku anglicky

There have been many studies focused on regional resilience and its particular determinants at regional level such as population size, industry mix, specialization/diversity, firm size structure, export orientation or institutions. Our research question is: which types of regions are more resilient: metropolitan or non-metropolitan regions, urban cores or hinterlands, peripheral, branch plant or single factory regions? These questions were examined in our case study of post-crisis (2009-2014) economic development of Czech city-regions. We propose a typology of city-regions based on particularities in economic structure, key actors and mechanisms of development. Eight main categories of Czech city-regions were distinguished: metropolitan cores, metropolitan hinterlands, medium-sized urban regions with metropolitan functions, peripheral city- regions, single factory city-regions dominated by a large domestic manufacturing firm, 'ordinary' diversified industrial city-regions, lower and higher-tiered branch plant regions dominated mostly by foreign-owned manufacturing assembly plants. We conducted a quantitative analysis focused on differences among the above mentioned types of regions in the dynamics of post-crisis growth of value added and employment in agriculture, industry, construction and business services. Empirical results show that differences in resilience among particular types of regions were relatively small. Surprisingly, single-factory city-regions and higher-tiered branch plant regions exhibited the most rapid pace of recovery, while the metropolitan cores and hinterlands lagged behind significantly.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50701 - Cultural and economic geography

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA18-11299S" target="_blank" >GA18-11299S: Vývoj trajektorií tradičních odvětví ve starých průmyslových regionech: governance, aktéři, instituce a leadership.</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

13th Southeast Asian Geography Association Conference (SEAGA 2017): Geography for Global Understanding: Sustainable Changes in Environment, Society and People

ISBN

9781713801375

ISSN

1755-1307

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

1-7

Název nakladatele

Institute of Physics Publishing

Místo vydání

—

Místo konání akce

Depok

Datum konání akce

28. 11. 2017

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—