Nagorno-Karabakh and Javakheti: two different trajectories of Armenian separatist movements

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17310%2F20%3AA21020Y2" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17310/20:A21020Y2 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.routledge.com/De-Facto-States-in-Eurasia-1st-Edition/Hoch-Kopecek/p/book/9780367199128" target="_blank" >https://www.routledge.com/De-Facto-States-in-Eurasia-1st-Edition/Hoch-Kopecek/p/book/9780367199128</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Nagorno-Karabakh and Javakheti: two different trajectories of Armenian separatist movements

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This chapter compares Javakheti and Nagorno-Karabakh – two territories inhabited by ethnic Armenians, which at the beginning of the 1990s had similar potential for separatism – and seeks to explain which factors led to the birth of Nagorno-Karabakh as a de facto state and which factors led to the eventual decline of the separatist movement in Javakheti. The author argues that the decisive factors were: existence, respectively non-existence of autonomous status within the USSR; different image of the two conflict zones in the eyes of the population of the Republic of Armenia, what led to a different engagement of the kin-state/patron state; the attitude of Russia; and the difference between Georgian and Azerbaijani approach to their Armenian minorities.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Nagorno-Karabakh and Javakheti: two different trajectories of Armenian separatist movements

Popis výsledku anglicky

This chapter compares Javakheti and Nagorno-Karabakh – two territories inhabited by ethnic Armenians, which at the beginning of the 1990s had similar potential for separatism – and seeks to explain which factors led to the birth of Nagorno-Karabakh as a de facto state and which factors led to the eventual decline of the separatist movement in Javakheti. The author argues that the decisive factors were: existence, respectively non-existence of autonomous status within the USSR; different image of the two conflict zones in the eyes of the population of the Republic of Armenia, what led to a different engagement of the kin-state/patron state; the attitude of Russia; and the difference between Georgian and Azerbaijani approach to their Armenian minorities.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA15-09249S" target="_blank" >GA15-09249S: De facto státy v severní Eurasii v kontextu ruské zahraniční politiky</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Hoch, T. and Kopeček, V. (Eds.) De Facto States in Eurasia

ISBN

978-0-367-19912-8

Počet stran výsledku

37

Strana od-do

109-135

Počet stran knihy

302

Název nakladatele

Routledge

Místo vydání

New York

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—