Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Comparison of water and benzene as probe liquids in thermoporometry of mesoporous carbons

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17310%2F24%3AA2502NIJ" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17310/24:A2502NIJ - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S138718112300553X" target="_blank" >https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S138718112300553X</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2023.112977" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.micromeso.2023.112977</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Comparison of water and benzene as probe liquids in thermoporometry of mesoporous carbons

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Water and benzene were compared as probe liquids for thermoporometric characterization of mesoporous carbons. For testing, four different carbonaceous materials were prepared by soft- or hard-templating procedures with mesopore diameters in the range 3–12 nm. In addition, all materials were tested in hydrophobic (pristine, carbonized at 900 ◦C) and hydrophilic (moderate oxidation by persulphate) form. The results show that both tested liquids express a good linear correlation between heat of melting in pores (measured as DSC peak area) and volume of mesopores. Melting point depression of probe liquid confined in pores related to mesopore size was found out to be steeper for benzene confirming a higher value of Gibbs-Thomson constant of benzene compared to water. Neither heat of melting in pores nor melting point depression were affected by carbon surface oxidation. Contrary, the non-freezing layer (δ layer) of a liquid in pores was considerably wider for most of hydrophilic samples than hydrophobic ones when water was employed, while it stayed nearly constant when benzene was applied. Nevertheless, both tested probe liquids generally enable to obtain similar pore size distributions if appropriate values of δ layers are used. Benzene as a probe liquid in thermoporometry of carbons have some advantages compared to water but only in limited cases. Benzene can be recommended for characterisation of large mesopores and its usage can be beneficial for comparison of analogous samples with different surface chemistry.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Comparison of water and benzene as probe liquids in thermoporometry of mesoporous carbons

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Water and benzene were compared as probe liquids for thermoporometric characterization of mesoporous carbons. For testing, four different carbonaceous materials were prepared by soft- or hard-templating procedures with mesopore diameters in the range 3–12 nm. In addition, all materials were tested in hydrophobic (pristine, carbonized at 900 ◦C) and hydrophilic (moderate oxidation by persulphate) form. The results show that both tested liquids express a good linear correlation between heat of melting in pores (measured as DSC peak area) and volume of mesopores. Melting point depression of probe liquid confined in pores related to mesopore size was found out to be steeper for benzene confirming a higher value of Gibbs-Thomson constant of benzene compared to water. Neither heat of melting in pores nor melting point depression were affected by carbon surface oxidation. Contrary, the non-freezing layer (δ layer) of a liquid in pores was considerably wider for most of hydrophilic samples than hydrophobic ones when water was employed, while it stayed nearly constant when benzene was applied. Nevertheless, both tested probe liquids generally enable to obtain similar pore size distributions if appropriate values of δ layers are used. Benzene as a probe liquid in thermoporometry of carbons have some advantages compared to water but only in limited cases. Benzene can be recommended for characterisation of large mesopores and its usage can be beneficial for comparison of analogous samples with different surface chemistry.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    10400 - Chemical sciences

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2024

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    MICROPOR MESOPOR MAT

  • ISSN

    1387-1811

  • e-ISSN

    1873-3093

  • Svazek periodika

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    01.03.2024

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    NL - Nizozemsko

  • Počet stran výsledku

    11

  • Strana od-do

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    001155808600001

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85181767060