Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Aspects of different growth responses of coniferous and broadleaved tree species in landslide research

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17310%2F25%3AA2603AZS" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17310/25:A2603AZS - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1125786525000827" target="_blank" >https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1125786525000827</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dendro.2025.126368" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.dendro.2025.126368</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Aspects of different growth responses of coniferous and broadleaved tree species in landslide research

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    This study investigates the differing responses of two tree species, P. abies and F. sylvatica, to landslide movements and their subsequent effects on landslide chronologies. These are the two most commonly used tree species in dendrogeomorphic landslide research in Central Europe and their combination is generally recommended. However, their specific effect on the resulting chronology is not yet taken into account although they are two quite different species. The research was conducted on 220 individuals of both species located in the Girová landslide area (Outer Western Carpathians), with a focus on the catastrophic event of May 2010. The study sought to understand how these species contribute to dendrogeomorphic reconstructions of landslide events, particularly by analyzing their growth responses and the frequency of growth disturbances (GDs) such as compression and tension wood. The results revealed significant differences in how P. abies and F. sylvatica responded to landslide activity. P. abies showed a higher frequency of GDs (compression wood), but exhibited greater inertia in its physiological response, potentially masking high-frequency landslide events. In contrast, F. sylvatica produced fewer GDs (tension wood), yet its response to landslides was more immediate and efficient, with 100 % intensity in tension wood formation, which helped create a minimum-noise chronology despite fewer identified events. The study highlights the advantages and limitations of both species in dendrogeomorphic research. While P. abies contributes more frequently to detecting landslide events, the inertia in compression wood formation can complicate the interpretation of rapid landslide movements. On the other hand, F. sylvatica, though less responsive in terms of GDs, provides a clearer and more precise landslide chronology. Future research should explore the physiological factors behind these species' different responses to enhance the accuracy of dendrogeomorphic reconstructions.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Aspects of different growth responses of coniferous and broadleaved tree species in landslide research

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    This study investigates the differing responses of two tree species, P. abies and F. sylvatica, to landslide movements and their subsequent effects on landslide chronologies. These are the two most commonly used tree species in dendrogeomorphic landslide research in Central Europe and their combination is generally recommended. However, their specific effect on the resulting chronology is not yet taken into account although they are two quite different species. The research was conducted on 220 individuals of both species located in the Girová landslide area (Outer Western Carpathians), with a focus on the catastrophic event of May 2010. The study sought to understand how these species contribute to dendrogeomorphic reconstructions of landslide events, particularly by analyzing their growth responses and the frequency of growth disturbances (GDs) such as compression and tension wood. The results revealed significant differences in how P. abies and F. sylvatica responded to landslide activity. P. abies showed a higher frequency of GDs (compression wood), but exhibited greater inertia in its physiological response, potentially masking high-frequency landslide events. In contrast, F. sylvatica produced fewer GDs (tension wood), yet its response to landslides was more immediate and efficient, with 100 % intensity in tension wood formation, which helped create a minimum-noise chronology despite fewer identified events. The study highlights the advantages and limitations of both species in dendrogeomorphic research. While P. abies contributes more frequently to detecting landslide events, the inertia in compression wood formation can complicate the interpretation of rapid landslide movements. On the other hand, F. sylvatica, though less responsive in terms of GDs, provides a clearer and more precise landslide chronology. Future research should explore the physiological factors behind these species' different responses to enhance the accuracy of dendrogeomorphic reconstructions.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    10508 - Physical geography

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    <a href="/cs/project/GA22-12522S" target="_blank" >GA22-12522S: Mikroskopická anatomie letokruhů stromů jako zdroj chronologických informací pro optimalizaci stanovení sesuvného hazardu</a><br>

  • Návaznosti

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2025

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Dendrochronologia

  • ISSN

    1125-7865

  • e-ISSN

    1612-0051

  • Svazek periodika

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    August 2025

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    DE - Spolková republika Německo

  • Počet stran výsledku

    10

  • Strana od-do

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    001500351500001

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-105006542149