Cognitive Consistency in Uncertain and Preference Involved Weights Determination

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17610%2F24%3AA25038K9" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17610/24:A25038K9 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/10.1142/S0218488524500107" target="_blank" >https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/10.1142/S0218488524500107</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218488524500107" target="_blank" >10.1142/S0218488524500107</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Cognitive Consistency in Uncertain and Preference Involved Weights Determination

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In uncertain information environment, bi-polar preferences can be elicited from experts and processed to be exerted over some weights determination for multiple-agents evaluation. Recently, some weighting methodologies and models in uncertain and preference involved environment with multiple opinions from multiple experts are proposed in some literature. However, in that existing method, when collecting different types of preferences from a single expert, sometimes some subtle cognitive inconsistency may occur. To eliminate such inconsistency, this work elaborately analyzes the possible reasons and proposes some amendment together with a new distinguishable set of formulations for modeling. In addition, we further consider two situations of the weighting models for the problem, with one only considering the situation of single expert with no risk of cognitive inconsistency and the other considering the case of multiple experts wherein some inconsistency might occur. Numerical example and comparison are also presented accordingly.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Cognitive Consistency in Uncertain and Preference Involved Weights Determination

Popis výsledku anglicky

In uncertain information environment, bi-polar preferences can be elicited from experts and processed to be exerted over some weights determination for multiple-agents evaluation. Recently, some weighting methodologies and models in uncertain and preference involved environment with multiple opinions from multiple experts are proposed in some literature. However, in that existing method, when collecting different types of preferences from a single expert, sometimes some subtle cognitive inconsistency may occur. To eliminate such inconsistency, this work elaborately analyzes the possible reasons and proposes some amendment together with a new distinguishable set of formulations for modeling. In addition, we further consider two situations of the weighting models for the problem, with one only considering the situation of single expert with no risk of cognitive inconsistency and the other considering the case of multiple experts wherein some inconsistency might occur. Numerical example and comparison are also presented accordingly.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10101 - Pure mathematics

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based SystemsVolume 32, Issue 2, Pages 255 - 2691 March 2024

ISSN

0218-4885

e-ISSN

1793-6411

Svazek periodika

—

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

SG - Singapurská republika

Počet stran výsledku

15

Strana od-do

255-269

Kód UT WoS článku

001205804900004

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85191046528