Comparison of liquid limit of soils resulted from casagrande test and modificated cone penetrometer methodology
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27120%2F16%3A86098758" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27120/16:86098758 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.02.063" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.02.063</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.02.063" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.proeng.2016.02.063</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Comparison of liquid limit of soils resulted from casagrande test and modificated cone penetrometer methodology
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
In this paper the experimental work in the field of evaluation the liquid limit is described. Two different types of soil were analyzed - loam (intermediate plasticity) and sodium bentonite (high plasticity). Two basic methods were used for the evaluation of the liquid limit - Casagrande percussion (cup) method and cone penetrometer method. Two approaches were applied to the evaluation of liquid limit based on cone penetrometer test (30o/80 g cone) - standard method assuming 20 mm penetration at liquid limit and new calibration line for cone penetrometer liquid limit - NCCLL (Mohajerani). Experimentally obtained calibration line assumes the influence of depth of cone penetration at liquid limit on undrained shear strength, which is not unique for all types of soils. The paper presents the comparison of results of liquid limit based on the previously mentioned methods. Presented results of laboratory tests show, that bentonite liquid limit based on the standard cone penetration test (using 20 mm penetration) is significantly lower in comparison with Casagrande liquid limit. On the other hand was verified very significant consistency of Casagrande liquid limit and liquid limit based on NCCLL (evaluated depth of penetration 29 mm). Obtained results indicate the need for further research in this area. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Comparison of liquid limit of soils resulted from casagrande test and modificated cone penetrometer methodology
Popis výsledku anglicky
In this paper the experimental work in the field of evaluation the liquid limit is described. Two different types of soil were analyzed - loam (intermediate plasticity) and sodium bentonite (high plasticity). Two basic methods were used for the evaluation of the liquid limit - Casagrande percussion (cup) method and cone penetrometer method. Two approaches were applied to the evaluation of liquid limit based on cone penetrometer test (30o/80 g cone) - standard method assuming 20 mm penetration at liquid limit and new calibration line for cone penetrometer liquid limit - NCCLL (Mohajerani). Experimentally obtained calibration line assumes the influence of depth of cone penetration at liquid limit on undrained shear strength, which is not unique for all types of soils. The paper presents the comparison of results of liquid limit based on the previously mentioned methods. Presented results of laboratory tests show, that bentonite liquid limit based on the standard cone penetration test (using 20 mm penetration) is significantly lower in comparison with Casagrande liquid limit. On the other hand was verified very significant consistency of Casagrande liquid limit and liquid limit based on NCCLL (evaluated depth of penetration 29 mm). Obtained results indicate the need for further research in this area. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
20100 - Civil engineering
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2016
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
Procedia Engineering. Volume 142
ISBN
978-1-5108-2222-1
ISSN
1877-7058
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
7
Strana od-do
363-369
Název nakladatele
Elsevier
Místo vydání
Brusel
Místo konání akce
Ho Či Minovo Město
Datum konání akce
11. 4. 2016
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
WRD - Celosvětová akce
Kód UT WoS článku
—