Assessment of the Summer Thermal Stability of the Attic Room Using Two Different Software
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27120%2F20%3A10245841" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27120/20:10245841 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/cee/16/2/article-p360.xml" target="_blank" >https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/cee/16/2/article-p360.xml</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/cee-2020-0036" target="_blank" >10.2478/cee-2020-0036</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Assessment of the Summer Thermal Stability of the Attic Room Using Two Different Software
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This paper presents the calculations of the summer thermal stability of a critical room of the given building. In this case, the critical room of the building is an attic room. Using two different software (SIMULACE and DesignBuilder), the summer thermal stability of the attic room was evaluated according to the Czech standard A SN 73 0540-2 [1]. This standard compares the calculated and required value of the maximum internal temperature in the summer period. The results from both software were compared with the Czech standard and also with each other. The resulting temperature courses in the interior differ by a few Celsius degrees. In conclusion, the causes of different results are discussed as well as the advantages and disadvantages of both software. (C) 2020 Kateřina Stejskalová et al., published by Sciendo.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Assessment of the Summer Thermal Stability of the Attic Room Using Two Different Software
Popis výsledku anglicky
This paper presents the calculations of the summer thermal stability of a critical room of the given building. In this case, the critical room of the building is an attic room. Using two different software (SIMULACE and DesignBuilder), the summer thermal stability of the attic room was evaluated according to the Czech standard A SN 73 0540-2 [1]. This standard compares the calculated and required value of the maximum internal temperature in the summer period. The results from both software were compared with the Czech standard and also with each other. The resulting temperature courses in the interior differ by a few Celsius degrees. In conclusion, the causes of different results are discussed as well as the advantages and disadvantages of both software. (C) 2020 Kateřina Stejskalová et al., published by Sciendo.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
20100 - Civil engineering
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2020
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Civil and Environmental Engineering
ISSN
1336-5835
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
16
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
PL - Polská republika
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
360-369
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85096787931