Safety Assesment of a Steel Frame Using LRFD and SBRA Methods

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27230%2F10%3A86076119" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27230/10:86076119 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Safety Assesment of a Steel Frame Using LRFD and SBRA Methods

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Powerful computers on each designer's desk, improvements in simulation technique and advances in the reliability assessment theory make it possible to consider a transition from prescriptive concepts, such as partial factor design (PFD), to fully probabilistic concepts applicable in design practice, such as the feasible Simulation-Based Reliability Assessment method (SBRA). Using a pilot example, the main differences between the PFD assessment procedure and SBRA procedure are demonstrated and described.Attention is focused on the substance of individual steps starting with the assignment (including a representation of loading, mechanical and geometrical properties of the structure, and characteristics of imperfections), and concluding the comparison with safety limits expressed vis-a-vis PFD by a ratio of Demand and Capacity (to be less than 1.0), and regarding SBRA by comparing the probability of failure Pf and design (target) probability Pd, i.e., Pf { Pd.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Safety Assesment of a Steel Frame Using LRFD and SBRA Methods

Popis výsledku anglicky

Powerful computers on each designer's desk, improvements in simulation technique and advances in the reliability assessment theory make it possible to consider a transition from prescriptive concepts, such as partial factor design (PFD), to fully probabilistic concepts applicable in design practice, such as the feasible Simulation-Based Reliability Assessment method (SBRA). Using a pilot example, the main differences between the PFD assessment procedure and SBRA procedure are demonstrated and described.Attention is focused on the substance of individual steps starting with the assignment (including a representation of loading, mechanical and geometrical properties of the structure, and characteristics of imperfections), and concluding the comparison with safety limits expressed vis-a-vis PFD by a ratio of Demand and Capacity (to be less than 1.0), and regarding SBRA by comparing the probability of failure Pf and design (target) probability Pd, i.e., Pf { Pd.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

JN - Stavebnictví

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA103%2F07%2F0557" target="_blank" >GA103/07/0557: Pravděpodobnostní posuzování inženýrské spolehlivosti konstrukcí</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2010

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Practice Periodical on Structrual Design and Construction

ISSN

1084-0680

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

15

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

10

Strana od-do

—

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—