Comparative Analysis of Subjective Indoor Environment Assessment in Actual and Simulated Conditions

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27230%2F24%3A10258889" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27230/24:10258889 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/3/656" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/3/656</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en17030656" target="_blank" >10.3390/en17030656</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparative Analysis of Subjective Indoor Environment Assessment in Actual and Simulated Conditions

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This paper experimentally analyses an indoor environment assessment of a large group of respondents regarding their subjective perception of overall comfort, indoor air quality and humidity. The questionnaire survey was applied as a testing method together with measurements of the physical parameters conducted with a microclimate meter. Two types of environment were analysed: educational rooms and the climate chamber. The comparative analysis of the sensations experienced within them indicates that they generate quite similar responses; however, some discrepancies have been identified. The overall comfort of the climate chamber was typically assessed as being higher than that of the educational rooms at the same air temperature. The most favourable air temperature in the climate chamber was ca. 20.7 degrees C, while in the educational rooms it was ca. 22.3 degrees C. The most preferable conditions in the climate chamber occurred at a thermal sensation vote of -0.4 (&quot;pleasantly slightly cool&quot;), while in the educational rooms it occurred at +0.2 (&quot;neutral/pleasantly slightly warm&quot;). Quite strong correlations between overall comfort and indoor air quality as well as between humidity assessment and humidity preference votes were observed, which did not seem to depend on the type of environment. These findings are important because results from the simulated conditions are often used in the analyses of actual living/working environments.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparative Analysis of Subjective Indoor Environment Assessment in Actual and Simulated Conditions

Popis výsledku anglicky

This paper experimentally analyses an indoor environment assessment of a large group of respondents regarding their subjective perception of overall comfort, indoor air quality and humidity. The questionnaire survey was applied as a testing method together with measurements of the physical parameters conducted with a microclimate meter. Two types of environment were analysed: educational rooms and the climate chamber. The comparative analysis of the sensations experienced within them indicates that they generate quite similar responses; however, some discrepancies have been identified. The overall comfort of the climate chamber was typically assessed as being higher than that of the educational rooms at the same air temperature. The most favourable air temperature in the climate chamber was ca. 20.7 degrees C, while in the educational rooms it was ca. 22.3 degrees C. The most preferable conditions in the climate chamber occurred at a thermal sensation vote of -0.4 (&quot;pleasantly slightly cool&quot;), while in the educational rooms it occurred at +0.2 (&quot;neutral/pleasantly slightly warm&quot;). Quite strong correlations between overall comfort and indoor air quality as well as between humidity assessment and humidity preference votes were observed, which did not seem to depend on the type of environment. These findings are important because results from the simulated conditions are often used in the analyses of actual living/working environments.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

20700 - Environmental engineering

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

O - Projekt operacniho programu

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Energies

ISSN

1996-1073

e-ISSN

1996-1073

Svazek periodika

17

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

CH - Švýcarská konfederace

Počet stran výsledku

16

Strana od-do

nestránkováno

Kód UT WoS článku

001159104200001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—