Knowledge Representation and Communication in the Multi-Agent World

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27240%2F07%3A00014962" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27240/07:00014962 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Knowledge Representation and Communication in the Multi-Agent World

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The use-mention distinction is traditionally understood as the distinction between using an expression (or phrase, etc.) and mentioning it. Making a statement mention itself is an interesting way of producing logical paradoxes. Violation of the use-mention distinction can produce sentences that sound and appear similar to the original, but have an entirely different meaning. However, a lot of misunderstanding and many paradoxes arise also from confusing different ways in which a meaningful expression can be used. Though there is a lot of dispute on using-mentioning expressions, surprisingly, little attention has been paid to the distinction between using and mentioning entities which are referred to when the expression is used. There are many examplesof such paradoxes, see, e.g., Gamut (1991, pp. 203,204). To adduce one, consider the following (obviously invalid) argument: The temperature in Amsterdam equals the temperature in Prague. The temperature in Amsterdam is increasing. Hence:

Název v anglickém jazyce

Knowledge Representation and Communication in the Multi-Agent World

Popis výsledku anglicky

The use-mention distinction is traditionally understood as the distinction between using an expression (or phrase, etc.) and mentioning it. Making a statement mention itself is an interesting way of producing logical paradoxes. Violation of the use-mention distinction can produce sentences that sound and appear similar to the original, but have an entirely different meaning. However, a lot of misunderstanding and many paradoxes arise also from confusing different ways in which a meaningful expression can be used. Though there is a lot of dispute on using-mentioning expressions, surprisingly, little attention has been paid to the distinction between using and mentioning entities which are referred to when the expression is used. There are many examplesof such paradoxes, see, e.g., Gamut (1991, pp. 203,204). To adduce one, consider the following (obviously invalid) argument: The temperature in Amsterdam equals the temperature in Prague. The temperature in Amsterdam is increasing. Hence:

Druh

A - Audiovizuální tvorba

CEP obor

IN - Informatika

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/1ET101940420" target="_blank" >1ET101940420: Logika a umělá inteligence pro multiagentní systémy</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2007

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

ISBN

—

Místo vydání

Kyoto

Název nakladatele resp. objednatele

NICT

Verze

—

Identifikační číslo nosiče

CD