Property Modifiers and Intensional Essentialism

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27240%2F17%3A10238408" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27240/17:10238408 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.13053/CyS-21-4-2811" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.13053/CyS-21-4-2811</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.13053/CyS-21-4-2811" target="_blank" >10.13053/CyS-21-4-2811</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Property Modifiers and Intensional Essentialism

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In this paper, I deal with property modifiers defined as functions that associate a given root property P with a modified property [M P]. Property modifiers typically divide into four kinds, namely intersective, subsective, privative and modal. Here I do not deal with modal modifiers like alleged, which appear to be well-nigh logically lawless, because, for instance, an alleged assassin is or is not an assassin. The goal of this pa-per is to logically define the three remaining kinds of modifiers together with the rule of left subsectivity that I launch as the rule of pseudo-detachment to replace the modifier M in the premise by the property M* in the conclusion, and prove that the rule of pseudo-detachment is valid for all kinds of modifiers. Furthermore, it is defined in a way that avoids paradoxes like a small elephant being smaller than a large mouse.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Property Modifiers and Intensional Essentialism

Popis výsledku anglicky

In this paper, I deal with property modifiers defined as functions that associate a given root property P with a modified property [M P]. Property modifiers typically divide into four kinds, namely intersective, subsective, privative and modal. Here I do not deal with modal modifiers like alleged, which appear to be well-nigh logically lawless, because, for instance, an alleged assassin is or is not an assassin. The goal of this pa-per is to logically define the three remaining kinds of modifiers together with the rule of left subsectivity that I launch as the rule of pseudo-detachment to replace the modifier M in the premise by the property M* in the conclusion, and prove that the rule of pseudo-detachment is valid for all kinds of modifiers. Furthermore, it is defined in a way that avoids paradoxes like a small elephant being smaller than a large mouse.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA15-13277S" target="_blank" >GA15-13277S: Hyperintensionální logika pro analýzu přirozeného jazyka</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2017

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Computación y Sistemas

ISSN

1405-5546

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

21

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

MX - Spojené státy mexické

Počet stran výsledku

14

Strana od-do

601-613

Kód UT WoS článku

000423818100004

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85040375428