Comparison of Fetal Phonocardiogram Wavelet Denoising Methods

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27240%2F18%3A10243213" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27240/18:10243213 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8615621" target="_blank" >https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8615621</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparison of Fetal Phonocardiogram Wavelet Denoising Methods

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Fetal heart sounds have always been one of the main parameters to focus on in terms of monitoring the well-being of a fetus. In the past, intermittent auscultation was the main technique in midwifery and obstetrics, and Pinard Horn the main equipment of the clinicians. The accuracy of the method was highly dependent on the skills and experiences of the examiner [1]. This method was later replaced by the continuous Electronic Fetal Monitoring (EFM), also known as Cardiotocography (CTG), using Doppler Effect for monitoring of the fetal heart rate (fHR). By using the computer technology, the performance of the method should be higher than intermittent auscultation. However, many studies claim that this presumption is questionable [2], [3]. Moreover, the drawback of Doppler-based EFM is that it does not allow to monitor fetal heart rate variability. Therefore, some short time changes may occur unnoticed [4].

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparison of Fetal Phonocardiogram Wavelet Denoising Methods

Popis výsledku anglicky

Fetal heart sounds have always been one of the main parameters to focus on in terms of monitoring the well-being of a fetus. In the past, intermittent auscultation was the main technique in midwifery and obstetrics, and Pinard Horn the main equipment of the clinicians. The accuracy of the method was highly dependent on the skills and experiences of the examiner [1]. This method was later replaced by the continuous Electronic Fetal Monitoring (EFM), also known as Cardiotocography (CTG), using Doppler Effect for monitoring of the fetal heart rate (fHR). By using the computer technology, the performance of the method should be higher than intermittent auscultation. However, many studies claim that this presumption is questionable [2], [3]. Moreover, the drawback of Doppler-based EFM is that it does not allow to monitor fetal heart rate variability. Therefore, some short time changes may occur unnoticed [4].

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

20201 - Electrical and electronic engineering

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

2018 IEEE Signal Processing in Medicine and Biology Symposium, SPMB 2018 - Proceedings

ISBN

978-1-5386-5916-8

ISSN

2372-7241

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

3

Strana od-do

"neuvedeno"

Název nakladatele

IEEE

Místo vydání

Piscataway

Místo konání akce

Filadelfie

Datum konání akce

1. 12. 2018

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

000462844100024