Adjustment of goal-driven resolution for natural language processing in TIL
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27240%2F19%3A10243177" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27240/19:10243177 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://nlp.fi.muni.cz/raslan/raslan19.pdf" target="_blank" >https://nlp.fi.muni.cz/raslan/raslan19.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Adjustment of goal-driven resolution for natural language processing in TIL
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The paper deals with natural language reasoning and question answering. Having a fine-grained analysis of natural language sentences in the form of TIL (Transparent Intensional Logic) constructions, we apply the General Resolution Method (GRM) with its goal-driven strategy to answer the question (goal) raised on the natural language data. Not only that, we want to answer in an 'intelligent' way, so that to provide logical consequences entailed by the data. From this point of view, GRM appears to be one of the most plausible proof techniques. There are two main new results presented here. First, we found out that it is not always possible to apply all the necessary adjustments of the input constructions first, and then to go on in a standard way by applying the algorithm of the transformation of propositional constructions into the Skolem clausal form followed by the GRM goal-driven resolution techniques. There are plenty of features special for the rich natural language semantics that are dealt with by TIL technical rules and these rules must be integrated with the process of the goal-driven resolution technique rather than separated from it. Second, the strategy of generating resolvents from a given knowledge base cannot be strictly goal-driven. Though we start with a given goal/question, it may happen that there is a point at which we have to make a step aside. We have to apply those special TIL technical rules on another clause first, and only then it is possible to go on with the process of resolving clauses with a given goal. Otherwise our inference machine would be heavily underinferring, which is not desirable, of course. We demonstrate these new results by two simple examples. The first one deals with property modifiers and anaphoric references. Anaphoric references are dealt with by our substitution method, and the second example demonstrates reasoning with factive verbs like 'knowing' together with definite descriptions and anaphoric references again. Since the definite description occurs de re here, we substitute a pointer to the individual referred to for the respective anaphoric pronoun.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Adjustment of goal-driven resolution for natural language processing in TIL
Popis výsledku anglicky
The paper deals with natural language reasoning and question answering. Having a fine-grained analysis of natural language sentences in the form of TIL (Transparent Intensional Logic) constructions, we apply the General Resolution Method (GRM) with its goal-driven strategy to answer the question (goal) raised on the natural language data. Not only that, we want to answer in an 'intelligent' way, so that to provide logical consequences entailed by the data. From this point of view, GRM appears to be one of the most plausible proof techniques. There are two main new results presented here. First, we found out that it is not always possible to apply all the necessary adjustments of the input constructions first, and then to go on in a standard way by applying the algorithm of the transformation of propositional constructions into the Skolem clausal form followed by the GRM goal-driven resolution techniques. There are plenty of features special for the rich natural language semantics that are dealt with by TIL technical rules and these rules must be integrated with the process of the goal-driven resolution technique rather than separated from it. Second, the strategy of generating resolvents from a given knowledge base cannot be strictly goal-driven. Though we start with a given goal/question, it may happen that there is a point at which we have to make a step aside. We have to apply those special TIL technical rules on another clause first, and only then it is possible to go on with the process of resolving clauses with a given goal. Otherwise our inference machine would be heavily underinferring, which is not desirable, of course. We demonstrate these new results by two simple examples. The first one deals with property modifiers and anaphoric references. Anaphoric references are dealt with by our substitution method, and the second example demonstrates reasoning with factive verbs like 'knowing' together with definite descriptions and anaphoric references again. Since the definite description occurs de re here, we substitute a pointer to the individual referred to for the respective anaphoric pronoun.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2019
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
Thirteenth workshop on Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Language Processing, RASLAN 2019 : Karlova Studánka, Czech Republic, December 6-8, 2019 : proceedings
ISBN
978-80-263-1530-8
ISSN
2336-4289
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
12
Strana od-do
71-82
Název nakladatele
Tribun EU
Místo vydání
Brno
Místo konání akce
Karlova Studánka
Datum konání akce
6. 12. 2019
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
EUR - Evropská akce
Kód UT WoS článku
000604899800009