A Comparison Between the Quality of Two Level and Three Levels Bidirectional Buck-Boost Converter Using the Neural Network Controller
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27240%2F24%3A10255352" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27240/24:10255352 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/61989100:27730/24:10255352
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10535512" target="_blank" >https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10535512</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3403769" target="_blank" >10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3403769</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
A Comparison Between the Quality of Two Level and Three Levels Bidirectional Buck-Boost Converter Using the Neural Network Controller
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
A comparison between two-phase and three-phase interlaced DC converter with parallel MOSFET is presented. PWM is evaluated using a two-way DC-DC converter to charge and discharge a battery. The results show an excellent DC voltage gain without an extremely high cycle load. The interlaced DC-DC converters with MOSFETs in parallel in two and three phases offer distinct advantages and limitations. The two-phase converter has a simpler design and a potentially lower cost due to the reduced number of components. However, it can present challenges in terms of precise voltage regulation and current balancing, due to the limited number of switching phases. On the other hand, the three-phase converter offers more precise voltage regulation and improved current balance thanks to its higher number of phases. While this results in increased design complexity and potentially higher cost, it allows for a more uniform distribution of current load among MOSFETs. The choice between the two will depend on the specific requirements of the application, acceptable trade-offs in terms of complexity, cost and performance, as well as the need for accurate voltage regulation and optimal current balancing.
Název v anglickém jazyce
A Comparison Between the Quality of Two Level and Three Levels Bidirectional Buck-Boost Converter Using the Neural Network Controller
Popis výsledku anglicky
A comparison between two-phase and three-phase interlaced DC converter with parallel MOSFET is presented. PWM is evaluated using a two-way DC-DC converter to charge and discharge a battery. The results show an excellent DC voltage gain without an extremely high cycle load. The interlaced DC-DC converters with MOSFETs in parallel in two and three phases offer distinct advantages and limitations. The two-phase converter has a simpler design and a potentially lower cost due to the reduced number of components. However, it can present challenges in terms of precise voltage regulation and current balancing, due to the limited number of switching phases. On the other hand, the three-phase converter offers more precise voltage regulation and improved current balance thanks to its higher number of phases. While this results in increased design complexity and potentially higher cost, it allows for a more uniform distribution of current load among MOSFETs. The choice between the two will depend on the specific requirements of the application, acceptable trade-offs in terms of complexity, cost and performance, as well as the need for accurate voltage regulation and optimal current balancing.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
20200 - Electrical engineering, Electronic engineering, Information engineering
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/TN02000025" target="_blank" >TN02000025: Národní centrum pro energetiku II</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
IEEE Access
ISSN
2169-3536
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
12
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
Volume: 12
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
14
Strana od-do
94323-94336
Kód UT WoS článku
001272158900001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—