Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Enhancing Power Quality in Industry 4.0 Manufacturing Using the Multi-Criteria Selection Method

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27240%2F24%3A10256084" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27240/24:10256084 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10499261" target="_blank" >https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10499261</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3388846" target="_blank" >10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3388846</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Enhancing Power Quality in Industry 4.0 Manufacturing Using the Multi-Criteria Selection Method

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Industry 4.0 technology is growing rapidly in the manufacturing industry and other businesses. Devices used in Industry 4.0 are manufactured with high-frequency switching functions and generate harmonics that negatively affect power quality. Choosing the direct or parallel connection method of the harmonic current absorber depends on the specific requirements of the system and the goal of improving power quality. Shunt Active Power Filter (SAPF) is the best device currently used to improve power quality. This study proposes to use the fuzzy-rough MARCOS method to make decisions on SAPF selection based on experts&apos; opinions to improve the quality of power sources at the source of smart manufacturing plants using Industry 4.0 devices. This study implements two decision-making methods in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM). The first is the SWARA method (Stepwise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis), and the second is the MARCOS method (Measurement Alternatives and Ranking According to Compromise Solution). The fuzzy-rough method is used to incorporate uncertain information into the results of decision-making and to use linguistic values. The analysis results of the fuzzy-rough SWARA method show that the price factor and power filter range has the greatest influence on the choice of SAPF for harmonic mitigation. Analysis results from the fuzzy-rough MARCOS method show that manufacturer Schneider Electric has the best features according to the evaluation results from decision makers. Sensitivity analysis methods were used to confirm the findings. The harmonic value THDi displayed in the field after installing the harmonic filter is, respectively, THDi $1=5$ %, THDi $2=6$ %, and THDi $3=5$ %, it meets the regulations of Circular 30/2019/TT-BCT. According to this circular, the requirement for total harmonic value (THDi) is below 12%. With THDi1, THDi2, and THDi3 values all below 12%. In operating electrical systems in production and business environments, using SAPF filters for harmonic mitigation helps improve power quality. The fuzzy-rough method is applied, and the decision maker&apos;s decisions are used to adjust the intention to use the SAPF set to suit the conditions.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Enhancing Power Quality in Industry 4.0 Manufacturing Using the Multi-Criteria Selection Method

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Industry 4.0 technology is growing rapidly in the manufacturing industry and other businesses. Devices used in Industry 4.0 are manufactured with high-frequency switching functions and generate harmonics that negatively affect power quality. Choosing the direct or parallel connection method of the harmonic current absorber depends on the specific requirements of the system and the goal of improving power quality. Shunt Active Power Filter (SAPF) is the best device currently used to improve power quality. This study proposes to use the fuzzy-rough MARCOS method to make decisions on SAPF selection based on experts&apos; opinions to improve the quality of power sources at the source of smart manufacturing plants using Industry 4.0 devices. This study implements two decision-making methods in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM). The first is the SWARA method (Stepwise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis), and the second is the MARCOS method (Measurement Alternatives and Ranking According to Compromise Solution). The fuzzy-rough method is used to incorporate uncertain information into the results of decision-making and to use linguistic values. The analysis results of the fuzzy-rough SWARA method show that the price factor and power filter range has the greatest influence on the choice of SAPF for harmonic mitigation. Analysis results from the fuzzy-rough MARCOS method show that manufacturer Schneider Electric has the best features according to the evaluation results from decision makers. Sensitivity analysis methods were used to confirm the findings. The harmonic value THDi displayed in the field after installing the harmonic filter is, respectively, THDi $1=5$ %, THDi $2=6$ %, and THDi $3=5$ %, it meets the regulations of Circular 30/2019/TT-BCT. According to this circular, the requirement for total harmonic value (THDi) is below 12%. With THDi1, THDi2, and THDi3 values all below 12%. In operating electrical systems in production and business environments, using SAPF filters for harmonic mitigation helps improve power quality. The fuzzy-rough method is applied, and the decision maker&apos;s decisions are used to adjust the intention to use the SAPF set to suit the conditions.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    20201 - Electrical and electronic engineering

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2024

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    IEEE Access

  • ISSN

    2169-3536

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    12

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    1

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    US - Spojené státy americké

  • Počet stran výsledku

    28

  • Strana od-do

    63171-63198

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    001219261900001

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus