Comparison of enterprises using building materials in the Czech Republic

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27350%2F20%3A10245005" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27350/20:10245005 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://gse.vsb.cz/ojs/index.php/GSE/article/view/301" target="_blank" >http://gse.vsb.cz/ojs/index.php/GSE/article/view/301</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparison of enterprises using building materials in the Czech Republic

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The article deals with the comparison of mining companies exploiting building materials in the Czech Republic. First, the legal form of all companies operating in the selected raw material segment is analysed. Subsequently, the actual comparison of the enterprises is carried out, which includes the most important enterprises of the individual raw material groups (brick raw material, decorative stone, building stone, gravel and sand). Selected companies are compared in the period 2011 - 2016 using six indicators: ROA, inventory turnover, total debt, immediate liquidity, DHM productivity, net working capital turnover time. The weighted sum method is used for self-evaluation. Indicator weights are determined using the Fuller triangle. The comparison shows that the following companies are the best in individual raw material groups: (i) Heluz s. r. o. (brick raw material), (ii) Granit Lipnice s. r. o. (decorative stone), (iii) EUROVIA Kamenolomy, a.s. (building stone), (iv) Českomoravský štěrk, a.s. (gravel and sand). When comparing the companies in the whole building material segment EUROVIA Kamenolomy, Plc. is the best company, followed by Kamenolomy ČR s. r. o. and Granit Lipnice s. r. o. The analysis also found that 54.24% of mining companies in the Czech Republic use the legal form of s. r. o. (Ltd.) and 26.69% are public or private limited companies - a. s. (Plc.). It was also found that the mining company with the highest production volume was not in first place in the group based on the comparisons made.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparison of enterprises using building materials in the Czech Republic

Popis výsledku anglicky

The article deals with the comparison of mining companies exploiting building materials in the Czech Republic. First, the legal form of all companies operating in the selected raw material segment is analysed. Subsequently, the actual comparison of the enterprises is carried out, which includes the most important enterprises of the individual raw material groups (brick raw material, decorative stone, building stone, gravel and sand). Selected companies are compared in the period 2011 - 2016 using six indicators: ROA, inventory turnover, total debt, immediate liquidity, DHM productivity, net working capital turnover time. The weighted sum method is used for self-evaluation. Indicator weights are determined using the Fuller triangle. The comparison shows that the following companies are the best in individual raw material groups: (i) Heluz s. r. o. (brick raw material), (ii) Granit Lipnice s. r. o. (decorative stone), (iii) EUROVIA Kamenolomy, a.s. (building stone), (iv) Českomoravský štěrk, a.s. (gravel and sand). When comparing the companies in the whole building material segment EUROVIA Kamenolomy, Plc. is the best company, followed by Kamenolomy ČR s. r. o. and Granit Lipnice s. r. o. The analysis also found that 54.24% of mining companies in the Czech Republic use the legal form of s. r. o. (Ltd.) and 26.69% are public or private limited companies - a. s. (Plc.). It was also found that the mining company with the highest production volume was not in first place in the group based on the comparisons made.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50200 - Economics and Business

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

GeoScience Engineering

ISSN

1802-5420

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

65

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

84-94

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—