Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

A Comparative Evaluation of Georeferencing Techniques in UAV Photogrammetry: a Case Study From the Czech Republic

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27350%2F25%3A10257962" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27350/25:10257962 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://technicalgeography.org/pdf/2_2025/13_moyo.pdf" target="_blank" >https://technicalgeography.org/pdf/2_2025/13_moyo.pdf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.21163/GT_2025.202.13" target="_blank" >10.21163/GT_2025.202.13</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    A Comparative Evaluation of Georeferencing Techniques in UAV Photogrammetry: a Case Study From the Czech Republic

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    The study evaluates the positional accuracy of geospatial products generated using direct (GNSS RTK-based) and indirect (Ground Control Points-based) georeferencing methods in UAV photogrammetry. Using the DJI Mavic 3 Enterprise quadcopter, surveys were conducted at two contrasting sites in the Czech Republic: a flat agricultural area and rugged terrain in the area affected by a landslide. Acquired RGB image sets were processed using consistent photogrammetric workflows. Resulting digital elevation models (DEMs) and orthophoto mosaics were analyzed against independently measuredcontrol points. Vertical and horizontal accuracies were assessed through RMSE and haversine-based distance calculations. Findings indicate that while both georeferencing methods produced centimeter-level accuracy, indirect georeferencing using GCPs yielded better quality in height. For horizontal accuracy, the results slightly varied between the two areas. In the flat area, direct georeferencing produced slightly better accuracy than indirect georeferencing whereas in the hilly area, the GCP-based approach was slightly superior. The study concludes that while GCPs can still provide some benefits in the quality of georeferencing, RTK-enabled UAVs offer a practical alternative for rapid, efficient deployment in suitable contexts.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    A Comparative Evaluation of Georeferencing Techniques in UAV Photogrammetry: a Case Study From the Czech Republic

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    The study evaluates the positional accuracy of geospatial products generated using direct (GNSS RTK-based) and indirect (Ground Control Points-based) georeferencing methods in UAV photogrammetry. Using the DJI Mavic 3 Enterprise quadcopter, surveys were conducted at two contrasting sites in the Czech Republic: a flat agricultural area and rugged terrain in the area affected by a landslide. Acquired RGB image sets were processed using consistent photogrammetric workflows. Resulting digital elevation models (DEMs) and orthophoto mosaics were analyzed against independently measuredcontrol points. Vertical and horizontal accuracies were assessed through RMSE and haversine-based distance calculations. Findings indicate that while both georeferencing methods produced centimeter-level accuracy, indirect georeferencing using GCPs yielded better quality in height. For horizontal accuracy, the results slightly varied between the two areas. In the flat area, direct georeferencing produced slightly better accuracy than indirect georeferencing whereas in the hilly area, the GCP-based approach was slightly superior. The study concludes that while GCPs can still provide some benefits in the quality of georeferencing, RTK-enabled UAVs offer a practical alternative for rapid, efficient deployment in suitable contexts.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    10500 - Earth and related environmental sciences

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2025

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Geographia Technica

  • ISSN

    1842-5135

  • e-ISSN

    2065-4421

  • Svazek periodika

    20

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    2

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    RO - Rumunsko

  • Počet stran výsledku

    13

  • Strana od-do

    205-217

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    001593097800013

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-105016011107