A Comparative Evaluation of Georeferencing Techniques in UAV Photogrammetry: a Case Study From the Czech Republic
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27350%2F25%3A10257962" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27350/25:10257962 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://technicalgeography.org/pdf/2_2025/13_moyo.pdf" target="_blank" >https://technicalgeography.org/pdf/2_2025/13_moyo.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.21163/GT_2025.202.13" target="_blank" >10.21163/GT_2025.202.13</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
A Comparative Evaluation of Georeferencing Techniques in UAV Photogrammetry: a Case Study From the Czech Republic
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The study evaluates the positional accuracy of geospatial products generated using direct (GNSS RTK-based) and indirect (Ground Control Points-based) georeferencing methods in UAV photogrammetry. Using the DJI Mavic 3 Enterprise quadcopter, surveys were conducted at two contrasting sites in the Czech Republic: a flat agricultural area and rugged terrain in the area affected by a landslide. Acquired RGB image sets were processed using consistent photogrammetric workflows. Resulting digital elevation models (DEMs) and orthophoto mosaics were analyzed against independently measuredcontrol points. Vertical and horizontal accuracies were assessed through RMSE and haversine-based distance calculations. Findings indicate that while both georeferencing methods produced centimeter-level accuracy, indirect georeferencing using GCPs yielded better quality in height. For horizontal accuracy, the results slightly varied between the two areas. In the flat area, direct georeferencing produced slightly better accuracy than indirect georeferencing whereas in the hilly area, the GCP-based approach was slightly superior. The study concludes that while GCPs can still provide some benefits in the quality of georeferencing, RTK-enabled UAVs offer a practical alternative for rapid, efficient deployment in suitable contexts.
Název v anglickém jazyce
A Comparative Evaluation of Georeferencing Techniques in UAV Photogrammetry: a Case Study From the Czech Republic
Popis výsledku anglicky
The study evaluates the positional accuracy of geospatial products generated using direct (GNSS RTK-based) and indirect (Ground Control Points-based) georeferencing methods in UAV photogrammetry. Using the DJI Mavic 3 Enterprise quadcopter, surveys were conducted at two contrasting sites in the Czech Republic: a flat agricultural area and rugged terrain in the area affected by a landslide. Acquired RGB image sets were processed using consistent photogrammetric workflows. Resulting digital elevation models (DEMs) and orthophoto mosaics were analyzed against independently measuredcontrol points. Vertical and horizontal accuracies were assessed through RMSE and haversine-based distance calculations. Findings indicate that while both georeferencing methods produced centimeter-level accuracy, indirect georeferencing using GCPs yielded better quality in height. For horizontal accuracy, the results slightly varied between the two areas. In the flat area, direct georeferencing produced slightly better accuracy than indirect georeferencing whereas in the hilly area, the GCP-based approach was slightly superior. The study concludes that while GCPs can still provide some benefits in the quality of georeferencing, RTK-enabled UAVs offer a practical alternative for rapid, efficient deployment in suitable contexts.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10500 - Earth and related environmental sciences
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Geographia Technica
ISSN
1842-5135
e-ISSN
2065-4421
Svazek periodika
20
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
RO - Rumunsko
Počet stran výsledku
13
Strana od-do
205-217
Kód UT WoS článku
001593097800013
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-105016011107