Velocity measurement and modelling of airflow for the purpose of cooling the rolled material
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27360%2F18%3A10239140" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27360/18:10239140 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Velocity measurement and modelling of airflow for the purpose of cooling the rolled material
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
In metallurgy, measurement of fluids flow rate and velocity, e.g. cooling water, air or heating gases, is usually a key part of the process control system with significant influence on quality and economy of the process. Controlled cooling of steel wire requires a specific amount and distribution of air over the width and length of the cooling conveyor. For purposes of measurement during adjusting of the technology, the originally recommended vane anemometer was compared to measurement based on pressure difference by Pitot and Prandtl tubes. Differences in the results obtained by these three types of sensors as well as sensitivity to the probe distance from the nozzle outlet and deviation of the sensor longitudinal axis from the flow direction were evaluated in the laboratory. CFD calculations of the air velocity profile in the nozzle outlet were done and compared to the measured values.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Velocity measurement and modelling of airflow for the purpose of cooling the rolled material
Popis výsledku anglicky
In metallurgy, measurement of fluids flow rate and velocity, e.g. cooling water, air or heating gases, is usually a key part of the process control system with significant influence on quality and economy of the process. Controlled cooling of steel wire requires a specific amount and distribution of air over the width and length of the cooling conveyor. For purposes of measurement during adjusting of the technology, the originally recommended vane anemometer was compared to measurement based on pressure difference by Pitot and Prandtl tubes. Differences in the results obtained by these three types of sensors as well as sensitivity to the probe distance from the nozzle outlet and deviation of the sensor longitudinal axis from the flow direction were evaluated in the laboratory. CFD calculations of the air velocity profile in the nozzle outlet were done and compared to the measured values.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>ost</sub> - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10305 - Fluids and plasma physics (including surface physics)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/LO1203" target="_blank" >LO1203: Regionální materiálově technologické výzkumné centrum - Program udržitelnosti</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2018
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Hutnické listy
ISSN
0018-8069
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
4
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
4
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
5
Strana od-do
27-32
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—