Comparison of the AHP and ANP approach to Investment Decision Making

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27510%2F13%3A86086655" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27510/13:86086655 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.vspj.cz/soubory/download/id/2259" target="_blank" >https://www.vspj.cz/soubory/download/id/2259</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparison of the AHP and ANP approach to Investment Decision Making

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The decision making can be performed according to perspectives, which may also have a conflicting nature. Models that are helpful in dealing with such problems can be found in decomposition multiple attribute decision making methods (MADM). In this paperthe authors are dealing with an investment decision making problem that can be divided into hierarchy of levels thus MADM methods the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) and the ANP (Analytic Network Process) are applied. The aim of the paper is to compareboth approaches their results and to analyse which of them has a better fit for actual investment decision making from entrepreneurs perspective. The sensitivity analysis is performed on results from AHP to assess sensitivity of alternatives ranking andweights values. The ANP method includes also the interrelationships among selected criteria. Results are compared.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparison of the AHP and ANP approach to Investment Decision Making

Popis výsledku anglicky

The decision making can be performed according to perspectives, which may also have a conflicting nature. Models that are helpful in dealing with such problems can be found in decomposition multiple attribute decision making methods (MADM). In this paperthe authors are dealing with an investment decision making problem that can be divided into hierarchy of levels thus MADM methods the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) and the ANP (Analytic Network Process) are applied. The aim of the paper is to compareboth approaches their results and to analyse which of them has a better fit for actual investment decision making from entrepreneurs perspective. The sensitivity analysis is performed on results from AHP to assess sensitivity of alternatives ranking andweights values. The ANP method includes also the interrelationships among selected criteria. Results are compared.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

AE - Řízení, správa a administrativa

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2013

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Mathematical Methods in Economics 2013 : 31st international conference : 11-13 September 2013, Jihlava, Czech Republic

ISBN

978-80-87035-76-4

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

303-308

Název nakladatele

College of Polytechnics Jihlava

Místo vydání

Jihlava

Místo konání akce

Jihlava

Datum konání akce

11. 9. 2013

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—