Arbitrability Limitation In Consumer (B2C) Disputes? : Consumers´Protection As Legal And Economic Phenomenon

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27510%2F13%3A86088042" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27510/13:86088042 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Arbitrability Limitation In Consumer (B2C) Disputes? : Consumers´Protection As Legal And Economic Phenomenon

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Protection of consumers became a phenomenon of many governmental politics. Retrieval of a balance between privat autonomy and protection of a weaker party is very sensitive. The particular degree of consumers protection through limitation of contractualautonomy (in B2C contracts) as well as procedural autonomy (regarding B2C dispute resolution mechanisms), as chosen by particular governments, has both legal and economic effects, in positive and negative sense. The European Court of Human Rights adjudicated repeatedly that traditional court litigation is not capable to grant effective protection to contractual claims in many countries. Arbitration is therefore one of possible tools for B2C dispute resolution, even if many countries and obviously the EUCommission followe rather an opposite strategy (keeping down arbitrability of B2C disputes in the opposite to US trends). Arbitration is not a cure-all and definitely not a method suitable for the resolution of any and all types of dispu

Název v anglickém jazyce

Arbitrability Limitation In Consumer (B2C) Disputes? : Consumers´Protection As Legal And Economic Phenomenon

Popis výsledku anglicky

Protection of consumers became a phenomenon of many governmental politics. Retrieval of a balance between privat autonomy and protection of a weaker party is very sensitive. The particular degree of consumers protection through limitation of contractualautonomy (in B2C contracts) as well as procedural autonomy (regarding B2C dispute resolution mechanisms), as chosen by particular governments, has both legal and economic effects, in positive and negative sense. The European Court of Human Rights adjudicated repeatedly that traditional court litigation is not capable to grant effective protection to contractual claims in many countries. Arbitration is therefore one of possible tools for B2C dispute resolution, even if many countries and obviously the EUCommission followe rather an opposite strategy (keeping down arbitrability of B2C disputes in the opposite to US trends). Arbitration is not a cure-all and definitely not a method suitable for the resolution of any and all types of dispu

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AG - Právní vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2013

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Governance and Regulation

ISSN

2220-9352

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

1

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

UA - Ukrajina

Počet stran výsledku

14

Strana od-do

156-170

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—