Concept of Foreign Arbitral Award in Connection with Recognition and Enforcement and Conflicts of Sources

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27510%2F13%3A86088191" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27510/13:86088191 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Concept of Foreign Arbitral Award in Connection with Recognition and Enforcement and Conflicts of Sources

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The term ?foreign arbitral award? is crucial for the applicability of the respective rules on recognition and enforcement. Most national lex arbitri also lack any explicit definition. The practice in application of the New York Convention (1958) is of essential importance, mainly of its Article 1(1). New York Convention suggests that there are two types of foreign arbitral awards, namely: (i) arbitral awards rendered in the territory of a state other than the state of recognition, and (ii) arbitral awards that are not considered local (national, domestic) awards in the state in which their recognition is sought. The reason for this differentiation consists of the differences in interpretation of the status of arbitral award in different jurisdiction. The Convention employs two criteria, a territorial criterion (as the most important one) and a functional criterion. Although the Convention undoubtedly has major significance, we must not entirely dismiss bilateral treaties, such as legal

Název v anglickém jazyce

Concept of Foreign Arbitral Award in Connection with Recognition and Enforcement and Conflicts of Sources

Popis výsledku anglicky

The term ?foreign arbitral award? is crucial for the applicability of the respective rules on recognition and enforcement. Most national lex arbitri also lack any explicit definition. The practice in application of the New York Convention (1958) is of essential importance, mainly of its Article 1(1). New York Convention suggests that there are two types of foreign arbitral awards, namely: (i) arbitral awards rendered in the territory of a state other than the state of recognition, and (ii) arbitral awards that are not considered local (national, domestic) awards in the state in which their recognition is sought. The reason for this differentiation consists of the differences in interpretation of the status of arbitral award in different jurisdiction. The Convention employs two criteria, a territorial criterion (as the most important one) and a functional criterion. Although the Convention undoubtedly has major significance, we must not entirely dismiss bilateral treaties, such as legal

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AG - Právní vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2013

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Romanian Journal of Arbitration

ISSN

1842-6859

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

26

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

RO - Rumunsko

Počet stran výsledku

20

Strana od-do

32-52

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—