Comparing Regions´ Ranking by MCDM methods: the Case of Visegrad Countries

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27510%2F14%3A86090625" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27510/14:86090625 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://wseas.org/wseas/cms.action?id=7655" target="_blank" >http://wseas.org/wseas/cms.action?id=7655</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparing Regions´ Ranking by MCDM methods: the Case of Visegrad Countries

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The paper solves the problem of an alternative access to quantitative evaluating of differences in the level of socio-economic development of regions in Visegrad Four countries (V4). The aim of the paper is to define the position of NUTS 2 regions in theperiod 2000-2010 by utilizing methods of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Technique for Order Preferences by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The sense of applying the methods will be setting the rank and mutual positions of NUTS 2 regions reflecting their socioeconomic development reached for the year 2000, 2005, 2010 based on selected regional data (criterion). The AHP, SAW and TOPSIS are concrete multicriteria decision-making methods (MCDM) which use thehierarchy of elements and ranking the alternatives according to utility and distance functions. Based on the application of methods we can gain detailed view on the regional development of regions by way of quantitative multidimensional

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparing Regions´ Ranking by MCDM methods: the Case of Visegrad Countries

Popis výsledku anglicky

The paper solves the problem of an alternative access to quantitative evaluating of differences in the level of socio-economic development of regions in Visegrad Four countries (V4). The aim of the paper is to define the position of NUTS 2 regions in theperiod 2000-2010 by utilizing methods of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Technique for Order Preferences by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The sense of applying the methods will be setting the rank and mutual positions of NUTS 2 regions reflecting their socioeconomic development reached for the year 2000, 2005, 2010 based on selected regional data (criterion). The AHP, SAW and TOPSIS are concrete multicriteria decision-making methods (MCDM) which use thehierarchy of elements and ranking the alternatives according to utility and distance functions. Based on the application of methods we can gain detailed view on the regional development of regions by way of quantitative multidimensional

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AH - Ekonomie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/EE2.3.20.0296" target="_blank" >EE2.3.20.0296: Výzkumný tým pro modelování ekonomických a finančních procesů na VŠB-TU Ostrava</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics

ISSN

1109-9526

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

Neuveden

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

11

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

12

Strana od-do

496-507

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—