Recognition And Enforcement Of Foreign Arbitral Awards: The Application Of The New York Convention By National Courts ? Czech Republic

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27510%2F14%3A86091797" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27510/14:86091797 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Recognition And Enforcement Of Foreign Arbitral Awards: The Application Of The New York Convention By National Courts ? Czech Republic

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The courts in the Czech Republic do not have any major problems with the application of the New York Convention. The Czech Republic (respectively the former Czechoslovakia) asserted a reciprocity reservation under Article I (3) of the New York Convention. The Czech Republic is also a signatory of many bilateral treaties on mutual legal assistance, which regularly deal with the issue of enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. Under Czech law, there is no exequatur proceeding. The grounds set out by Article V are not mandatory, as suggested by the English text of this provision (?may be refused?). The official Czech translation also retains this discretionary power. This implies that the judge is not obliged, according to the New York Convention, to refuse recognition and enforcement if one of the grounds of Article V exist, and the judge has the discretionary power to grant the recognition and enforcement of an award. It is arguable that in a case in which a ground for the refusal of en

Název v anglickém jazyce

Recognition And Enforcement Of Foreign Arbitral Awards: The Application Of The New York Convention By National Courts ? Czech Republic

Popis výsledku anglicky

The courts in the Czech Republic do not have any major problems with the application of the New York Convention. The Czech Republic (respectively the former Czechoslovakia) asserted a reciprocity reservation under Article I (3) of the New York Convention. The Czech Republic is also a signatory of many bilateral treaties on mutual legal assistance, which regularly deal with the issue of enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. Under Czech law, there is no exequatur proceeding. The grounds set out by Article V are not mandatory, as suggested by the English text of this provision (?may be refused?). The official Czech translation also retains this discretionary power. This implies that the judge is not obliged, according to the New York Convention, to refuse recognition and enforcement if one of the grounds of Article V exist, and the judge has the discretionary power to grant the recognition and enforcement of an award. It is arguable that in a case in which a ground for the refusal of en

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AG - Právní vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

The Lawyer Quarterly

ISSN

1805-8396

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

IV

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

17

Strana od-do

91-107

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—