Comparison of TOPSIS, COPRAS, ARAS and WASPAS methods in performance evaluation using crisp and interval data

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27510%2F16%3A10239493" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27510/16:10239493 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.ekf.vsb.cz/export/sites/ekf/rmfr/cs/sbornik/Soubory/Part_I.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.ekf.vsb.cz/export/sites/ekf/rmfr/cs/sbornik/Soubory/Part_I.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparison of TOPSIS, COPRAS, ARAS and WASPAS methods in performance evaluation using crisp and interval data

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Performance evaluation can have a significant impact on the functioning and development of a company. It is based on a set of possible measures is an important and difficult task for decision makers. This paper considers the performance evaluation constructed from primarily financial measures. In the proposed evaluation scheme the performances are expressed using crisp and interval values available. Criteria weights are calculated using objective approaches based on entropy and CRITIC methods. The goal of this paper is to compare four different MADM methods using crisp and interval data. These methods include TOPSIS, COPRAS, ARAS and WASPAS. Mathematical comparison with test data is used to determine the most appropriate MADM method for this task. The results of this paper will show the differences and applicability of these methods in practice.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparison of TOPSIS, COPRAS, ARAS and WASPAS methods in performance evaluation using crisp and interval data

Popis výsledku anglicky

Performance evaluation can have a significant impact on the functioning and development of a company. It is based on a set of possible measures is an important and difficult task for decision makers. This paper considers the performance evaluation constructed from primarily financial measures. In the proposed evaluation scheme the performances are expressed using crisp and interval values available. Criteria weights are calculated using objective approaches based on entropy and CRITIC methods. The goal of this paper is to compare four different MADM methods using crisp and interval data. These methods include TOPSIS, COPRAS, ARAS and WASPAS. Mathematical comparison with test data is used to determine the most appropriate MADM method for this task. The results of this paper will show the differences and applicability of these methods in practice.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50204 - Business and management

Projekt

Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Managing and Modelling of Financial Risks : proceedings of the 8th international scientific conference : September 5-6, 2016, Ostrava, Czech Republic

ISBN

978-80-248-3994-3

ISSN

2464-6970

e-ISSN

2464-6989

Počet stran výsledku

10

Strana od-do

217-226

Název nakladatele

VŠB - Technical University of Ostrava

Místo vydání

Ostrava

Místo konání akce

Ostrava

Datum konání akce

5. 9. 2016

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—