Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Extent of Procedural and Substantive Law in Arbitration and Litigation

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27510%2F16%3A86099452" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27510/16:86099452 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers2.cfm?abstract_id=2810572" target="_blank" >https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers2.cfm?abstract_id=2810572</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Extent of Procedural and Substantive Law in Arbitration and Litigation

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    The article analyses the fundamental premises of the differentiation between substantive and procedural rules in private international law and arbitration. The author opens the paper with the general differentiation between substantive and procedural rules and the reasons for such differentiation. The opening paragraphs are followed by a chapter dealing with the fundamental issues and premises of the differentiation between substantive and procedural rules in private international law. At the same time, the author endeavours to define a general approach applicable to such differentiation. Attention is devoted primarily to the specifics of such differentiation in arbitration and to a comparison with litigation. The general comments are followed by an analysis of the legal nature of limitation of actions and offset (set-off), the classification of which is significantly different in civil law countries (especially from the continental European approach) and in common law countries. The author also deals with the conflict-of-laws premises and the consequences of their nature, as they are perceived differently under the individual legal systems. Analysing the nature of these legal institutions and their conflict-of-laws implications helps to outline the general theoretical premises and the practical consequences of differentiation between the nature of substantive and procedural rules.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Extent of Procedural and Substantive Law in Arbitration and Litigation

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    The article analyses the fundamental premises of the differentiation between substantive and procedural rules in private international law and arbitration. The author opens the paper with the general differentiation between substantive and procedural rules and the reasons for such differentiation. The opening paragraphs are followed by a chapter dealing with the fundamental issues and premises of the differentiation between substantive and procedural rules in private international law. At the same time, the author endeavours to define a general approach applicable to such differentiation. Attention is devoted primarily to the specifics of such differentiation in arbitration and to a comparison with litigation. The general comments are followed by an analysis of the legal nature of limitation of actions and offset (set-off), the classification of which is significantly different in civil law countries (especially from the continental European approach) and in common law countries. The author also deals with the conflict-of-laws premises and the consequences of their nature, as they are perceived differently under the individual legal systems. Analysing the nature of these legal institutions and their conflict-of-laws implications helps to outline the general theoretical premises and the practical consequences of differentiation between the nature of substantive and procedural rules.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    D - Stať ve sborníku

  • CEP obor

    AG - Právní vědy

  • OECD FORD obor

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2016

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název statě ve sborníku

    Alternative means of conflict resolution in business - Verslas ir Alternatyvus ginčų sprendimo budai : proceedings : November 20, 2015, Vilnius, Lithuania

  • ISBN

    978-609-95634-1-1

  • ISSN

  • e-ISSN

  • Počet stran výsledku

    26

  • Strana od-do

    31-57

  • Název nakladatele

    Kazimiero Simonavičiaus Universitetas

  • Místo vydání

    Vilnius

  • Místo konání akce

    Vilnius

  • Datum konání akce

    20. 11. 2015

  • Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • Kód UT WoS článku