Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Evaluation of Indicators of Public Administration in EU Countries by use of Multidimensional Analysis

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27510%2F20%3A10245750" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27510/20:10245750 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://editorial.upce.cz/1804-8048/28/4/1136" target="_blank" >https://editorial.upce.cz/1804-8048/28/4/1136</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.46585/sp28041136" target="_blank" >10.46585/sp28041136</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Evaluation of Indicators of Public Administration in EU Countries by use of Multidimensional Analysis

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    The paper evaluates public administration from the viewpoint of selected indicators focused on the quality of government, corruption rate, e-public services and finance (government expenditures on public administration). The research covers the period 2012-2018 for the selected set of 28 EU countries and applies factor analysis and hierarchical cluster analysis. Results of the factor analysis showed that three economically developed countries, Denmark, Finland, and Sweden, attained the best results of public administration. By contrast, countries with the worst total results of public administration and a low economic level are Bulgaria, Romania, and Poland. Based on the evaluation of common indicators of public administration (performance of public administration and expenditures on public administration) using hierarchical cluster analysis, the EU countries were divided into four clusters by their internal similarity. The largest similarity in the performance of public administration is seen in two groups of countries, i.e. 16 countries. The largest similarity by government expenditures on public administration is seen in the countries in the second and fourth cluster, i.e. 17 countries. Following the analysed public administration indicators, the results also showed a link to traditional models of public administration in the majority of similar countries. This fact supports the specific features of administrative systems and the role related to management and evaluation of public administration.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Evaluation of Indicators of Public Administration in EU Countries by use of Multidimensional Analysis

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    The paper evaluates public administration from the viewpoint of selected indicators focused on the quality of government, corruption rate, e-public services and finance (government expenditures on public administration). The research covers the period 2012-2018 for the selected set of 28 EU countries and applies factor analysis and hierarchical cluster analysis. Results of the factor analysis showed that three economically developed countries, Denmark, Finland, and Sweden, attained the best results of public administration. By contrast, countries with the worst total results of public administration and a low economic level are Bulgaria, Romania, and Poland. Based on the evaluation of common indicators of public administration (performance of public administration and expenditures on public administration) using hierarchical cluster analysis, the EU countries were divided into four clusters by their internal similarity. The largest similarity in the performance of public administration is seen in two groups of countries, i.e. 16 countries. The largest similarity by government expenditures on public administration is seen in the countries in the second and fourth cluster, i.e. 17 countries. Following the analysed public administration indicators, the results also showed a link to traditional models of public administration in the majority of similar countries. This fact supports the specific features of administrative systems and the role related to management and evaluation of public administration.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50602 - Public administration

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    <a href="/cs/project/EE2.3.20.0296" target="_blank" >EE2.3.20.0296: Výzkumný tým pro modelování ekonomických a finančních procesů na VŠB-TU Ostrava</a><br>

  • Návaznosti

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2020

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice. Series D, Faculty of Economics and Administration

  • ISSN

    1211-555X

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    28

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    4

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    CZ - Česká republika

  • Počet stran výsledku

    11

  • Strana od-do

    1-11

  • Kód UT WoS článku

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85098219779